Reddit response to a post about a trans identified male saying that when wombs become available he'll use them to make white babies. Antifa sub members are surprised and disappointed that trans fascism exists

submitted by Immortallogic from (imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LeyMio 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You are censored by men above you, not the "feminists". It is hilarious how beta males don't even have the guts to admit it just because being under other men makes them feel ashamed. Women can live longer because they do less shit to themselves and other people. Women are the victims of men's crimes. That is the definition of being oppressed. Men who commit violent crimes are oppressing others. Why playing as victims when you are the cause of all the problems?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Men who commit violent crimes are oppressing others.

I knew we was kings and shit

[–]Trajan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Focussing on gender says a lot about how you ascribe agency. It's not dissimilar to how a racist sees skin colour as being salient when somebody mistreats them. Notice that I do not blame women. I blame feminists, and most women are not feminists. For the sake of treating people fairly I'd suggest you focus on the necessary rather than the incidental. I'll elaborate a little on this to get you started.

Is it necessary for Jack Dorsey or George Bridges (Evergreen State College) to be men in order to be censorious? Is it necessary for Ellen Pao or Susan Wojcicki to be women in order to be censorious? No, what unites these people is their hewing to an authoritarian leftist worldview driven by treating people differently based on identity. Is it necessary for Kathleen Kennedy to be a woman in order to horrifically mismanage Star Wars through arrogance and feminism? No, it's not necessary any more than Chris Chibnall (Doctor Who) and Alex Kurtzman (Star Trek) needed to be male in order to ruin their respective franchises. Again, it comes down to worldview.

Censorship is being driven by political views. I'd certainly be interested in hearing examples where you have been censored simply for being a woman and when expressing views entirely unconnected by politics. Do you have any?

[–]LeyMio 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The topic is not about any issue that both women and men are facing, but the hatred specifically targeted at women. Liberal feminists are politicians' puppets, and they exist for the purpose of serving men. Radical feminists are advocating for women's basic human rights and have always been excluded from the mainstream. The society is divided based on people race and gender. All political parties should be made accountable for the disaster. No one is arguing about whether men could face negative consequences from the political war. However, it does not change the fact that women's situation is much worse. As a guy, you can choose to be on either political side and receive different benefits from it. Women are politically homeless with no real "choice".

From what I have seen, people claim to be against "feminists" just for the sake of bullying the easiest targets. Like many other unpopular males, you are trying to get a sense of social acceptance by joining the witch-hunting crowd.