you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EddieC[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I can see how the quote could be interpreted as dissuading the voicing out of issues.

The way I read & understand the quote is that it is directed more towards thought / conversation leaders - these who would be in a better vantage point to more fully review and contemplate such issues, and ought to have at least some inkling on how to solve the issues.

I call such "leaders" who harp on the issues but stop short of the solutions Gatekeepers.

[–]Antarchomachus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I call such "leaders" who harp on the issues but stop short of the solutions Gatekeepers.

Took a look at the link, and I see what you (and Bell) are getting at. The 'culture warring' you mention is a good example of this, and I had never really viewed it in this context of railing against problems with no intent to solve it. You make an important point, but one that I think is hard to grasp without understanding that quote in its greater context (the only thing I know about Bell is what I gleaned from skimming the recent obituaries in the news)

Anyways, appreciate you explaining this one to me.

[–]EddieC[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are very welcome. I agree more context would help those less familiar, better understand the quote. Thank you for providing that opportunity.