you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]StillLessons[S] 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

My machine still not allowing me to link to zh. Not sure what that's about.

Anyway, interesting to see the government in Canada amplifying this beyond a protest about mandates into a political attempt at overthrow. From what I have heard from the convoy side, it sounds like "Drop the covid restrictions and we go home."

Pause a moment to see just how vital to their purpose the government sees these covid measures to be. Rather than heed a clear (and clearly with backing from significant portion of their population) demand to end the covid regime, they would rather turn the volume on this up to a "civil war" scenario. What then is the actual purpose of the regime? What do the covid restrictions provide them such that the alternative (no restrictions) must be stopped even if that requires suppression of their population at a level that only a civil war can offer them?

There is something deeply alarming about just how violently the sociopaths in the west are willing to defend their claim on the bodily integrity of their citizens.

Honk, Honk!

[–]JasonCarswell 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Pause a moment to see just how vital to their purpose the government sees these covid measures to be.

It's been a big un-noble lie from the beginning. They knew it. We know it.

...they would rather turn the volume on this up to a "civil war" scenario.

This has obviously always been their plan. There is no turning back for them. They also have the ability to money, strangle supply chains, and have the monopoly on violence.

What do the covid restrictions provide them [...] only a civil war can offer them?

Exactly.

There is something deeply alarming about just how violently the sociopaths in the west are willing to defend their claim on the bodily integrity of their citizens.

Depopulation agenda.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Depopulation honk!

[–]rubberbiscuit 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Absolutely alarming lack of any sort of attempt at compromise. Here are additional thoughts - https://communities.win/c/AskWin/p/141YS5kpvz/trudeau-piece-of-turd-that-he-is/c

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Good comments.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]HiddenFox 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Just a thought on zh not working. I remember reading that firefox was going to start blocking/censoring on the browser level before you could even view content. Not sure if this is that, just a thought

    [–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    I've had browser issues with some sites too. I didn't have time to figure it out, but I suspect a browser update fixed some recently.

    [–]BravoVictor 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    My machine still not allowing me to link to zh. Not sure what that's about.

    Your machine? Link? You mean your computer is unable to visit zerohedge.com articles? Then how did you get that link?

    Are you behind a firewall run by a lefty douchebag? I've seen some of them ban conservative leaning news sites.

    [–]StillLessons[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Thanks for all the ideas about the weird "linking" issue with zh.

    When I say I can't link, what I mean is that if I try to create a "link" post to zerohedge, it always hangs up and won't attach the article as that kind of post. But then I can put the link in the body of a text post just as I did here and it's fine.

    This is just some bizarre glitch. Oddly enough, while I'm suspicious about just about everything these days, I'm not suspicious about this, because it's just zerohedge. I can make link posts to almost all other sites, no matter how "conspiracy" the content (infowars, for example). There's just some weird coordination hangup somewhere with zerohedge in particular. Doesn't really matter; you all were able to link through to the article anyway through the link in the body.

    Great comments on the article. Thanks.