you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

There are a ton of links to primary sources backing up the text. But I guess you're just here to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt and to convince people not to click.

When they're trying to convince you not to click? Definitely click.

[–]cunninglingus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

links to primary sources backing up the text.

Unreliable sources

Your and her support of Putin's propaganda and genocide of Ukrainians - with these baseless claims - is revolting.

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You mean like the link to NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg’s surprising refutation of a year and a half of empire propaganda by openly admitting that NATO expansion provoked the invasion of Ukraine and acknowledging that NATO powers rejected Moscow’s proposed compromises which could have averted the war?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GED33Xkaqcw

Remember folks, when you're told not to do click - always click.

[–]Site_rly_sux 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's a ninety minute long video. Is there any specific point in the video that you feel backs up your point?

It wouldn't even be evidence anyway, because the secretary general of NATO is not a job that decides when or why russia goes to war. Putin didn't just record long videos for you, back in Feb 22, he also wrote long ass essays "on the brotherly relationship" or whatever. Putin explained exactly why he was going to war: he said it's because Peter's Rossiya empire doesn't make any logical sense without Ruthenia.

He said "If you want decommunisation then let's go all the way, no half measures" remember how he recorded a video of himself saying that and then uploaded it to the internet and then invaded Ukraine.

It's because russia / Z / Putin / Dugin has his own view of history. You're not capturing it correctly when you just say "durr it's about NATO". There's also the biolabs, the supersoldiers, the crucified children, the banderamobiles driving around the cities, a whole host of ruthenian issues that you aren't capturing.

You should pay more attention to Putin who explained it a lot better than Jens

Why is chipit linking you to NATO and not the direct word of president Vladimirovic himself? Is it because chipit is a psyop? People ought to ask themselves

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One opinion by one person is not evidence, at all.