Taliban successfully eradicates poppy cultivation: Report
submitted 10 months ago by Drewski from (thecradle.co)
[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
"Why would they want to do that?" CIA, DEA, and other drug cartels
[–]UncleWillard56 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
"Afghan poppy cultivation, which long provided most of the world’s heroin supply, flourished for decades due to US intervention in the country"
Wrong. The US actually paid Afghanistan $30 million to stop cultivating poppies and concentrate on other crops, but it damn near destroyed the economy, not to mention it was hardly enforceable. That's been a staple crop in the region for centuries, as is hash. The US had no more or less impact on that than did the USSR and the Brits before them.
The question now is, can the Taliban get them to grow something else that will maintain the economy? If they can, good for them. You just got rid of a huge criminal enterprise for legal crops. That'd be a win. I'm going to venture a guess that, even with the religious angle, that's not going to happen. Either farmers in the remotest areas will continue to grow it and it will impact the economy, or they won't and it'll wreck what little economy they have.
[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
archive.today mirror
[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
Those fuckers. This is why I can't get heroin.
[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
I suspect the boom of synthetic opiates (fent) are squeezing the profitability out of old school poppy production.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]UncleWillard56 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)