you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Bigs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"It also shows those who got a second dose were also more likely to die than those who got only one" Erm.. your own post, right there, says 1st dose av 2.41 per 100k, while 2 dose av 2.18 per 100k.

So it's actually 1 dose that's most deadly - I guess those who die or had a bad reaction don't go back for a 2nd dose.

My first and immediate reaction to these figures is that 'Well yeah, the elderly and vulnerable were vaxxed, and we'd expect them to die more than the young and healthy..." but that train left the station a long time ago. Many young and healthy people, the MAJORITY of such people in the UK, are now vaxxed. So when the results are per 100,000 people we cannot keep on forever claiming 'Well they're the old and frail".

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Erm.. your own post, right there, says 1st dose av 2.41 per 100k, while 2 dose av 2.18 per 100k.

It says the opposite please read more carefully. Perhaps they're in a confusing order in my post or something, but you've switched the numbers for 1st dose and 2 dose in your comment here.

[–]Bigs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ooer, you put unvaxxed, 2 stabs and then 21 days after 1 stab?

Hokay....

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It was how the data was organized... I guess I could've done it better but that's very much aside from the point being discussed here