[The following post was removed by Reddit filters through ONE hardban by Reddit. This post is to be maintained for posterity]

---

Howdy folks. It's been a long three years. Currently, I'm in the process of writing out the lies of Russiagate to help people dissect this New Cold War that the DNC caused. If you want a corrollary, read this to learn this in a succinct way. I usually do things in a long, drawn out way with a lot of links so you can see why it was the way it was. This is a Slam Jam basically. Effectively, you look at the lies, point out what they are, then block the shot of anyone trying to put that in your ball net preferably with your favorite Slam Jam Remix

But first things first...

Hillary lost to a game show host. And for the next two years, she swore vengeance and anger on the country because she wouldn't be Queen of the Universe like she always dreamed of. But we have to go back further. You see... Hillary was NEVER the democratic nominee. Bernie won the nomination according to Michael Moore and Hillary being so vindictive, she meddled in the election

“I completely rule out a possibility that the Russian government or the government bodies have been involved in this” -Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin’s spokesman

June 14, 2016 The DNC releases a statement claiming they have been hacked. Washington Post
June 15, 2016 Crowdstrike (cybersecurity firm) releases reports suggesting the DNC was hacked by Russians Crowdstrike
June 15, 2016 Guccifer 2.0 publishes first DNC email documents and claims he has sent them to Wikileaks.Guccifer insists he is not Russian. Guccifer 2.0 blog
June 16, 2016 Vice publishes article titled “‘Guccifer 2.0’ Is Likely a Russian Government Attempt to Cover Up Its Own Hack.” Other media outlets follow suit calling Guccifer a Russian government job Vice
July 22, 2016 Wikileaks releases the DNC email documents Wikileaks
July 27, 2016 Trump “Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing” joke that starts allegations of Russian collusion Politico.

The DNC began to run with the story as the story began to get bigger, while neglecting the contents inside the E-Mails that had been leaked by Guccifer 2.0. Other leakers would leak E-Mails that the DNC would continue to blame Russian Intelligence for their campaign fails with the HRC campaign.

Take note of this. We'll get back to it. We're focused on Hillary and the DNC for now. Hillary was so unpopular, her own party knew it. Chris Dodd pointed this out in 2008:

"Whether it's fair or not fair, the fact of the matter is that my colleague from New York, Senator Clinton, there are 50 percent of the American public that say they're not going to vote for her," Dodd said. "We as a party certainly have to take that into consideration."

But let's look at what I wrote in the past

In 2016, 88 million Americans did not vote. So Clinton got a blowback worse than Mondale in the 1980 election.

Again... 76% of the public did not vote for Hillary Clinton. A lot more than 50% as Dodd put it.

That's the failure of the party to promote a candidate that could get that vote and win against Trump. That's the cost of rigging a primary. That, and losing 1200 seats to conservatives over conservative lite under Obama.

So... Before ANYTHING ELSE... Hillary interfered in the 2016 election and lost to a game show host.
Drink the tears of the neoliberals especially Russia Madcow who lied to you for TWO. YEARS.

So... If you were a part of this and you weren't duped, watched the Convention (where Russiagate started going against Russia and Wikileaks) and were still on the side of "This is bullshit" let me put one more shrimp on this Barbie (bitch).

Podesta cooked up this scheme of Trump and Russia since 2015:

Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin, but not go too far betting on Putin re Syria. Brent

But after she lost:

Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative that Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation.

So we're done with the instigator of Russiagate. Let's move to the intelligence services (CIA, FBI, NSA)

Their job was to prove that Russians hacked the elections. Let's be very frank. If Russians DID hack the election, they should be disbanded immediately. They basically failed to do their jobs and with the NSA spying program, they should have had the packets to figure out how Russia hacked everything. For this, go to BAR or look into William Binney and what they say:

The corporate media and their friends in the Democratic Party are whipping up so much hatred and disinformation that it is almost impossible to discuss Russia or its president, Vladimir Putin. Putin is a multi-purpose villain. He is blamed for the vote theft conducted by white Americans against black people that resulted in the Donald Trump presidency.

...

“The evidence that should be there is absent; otherwise, it would surely be brought forward, since this could be done without any danger to sources and methods,” the letter stated. “Thus, we conclude that the emails were leaked by an insider – as was the case with Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning. Such an insider could be anyone in a government department or agency with access to NSA databases, or perhaps someone within the DNC.”

Overall, RG has been a sledgehammer against the left, not in their benefit. Now I could get into the FBI corruption but for those in the audience claiming that the CIA isn't a part of this, don't worry fam, the WSWS gotchu covered:

Since its establishment in 1947—under the administration of Democratic President Harry Truman—the CIA has been legally barred from carrying out within the United States the activities which were its mission overseas: spying, infiltration, political provocation, assassination. These prohibitions were given official lip service but ignored in practice.

...

If on November 6 the Democratic Party makes the net gain of 24 seats needed to win control of the House of Representatives, former CIA agents, military commanders, and State Department officials will provide the margin of victory and hold the balance of power in Congress. The presence of so many representatives of the military-intelligence apparatus in the legislature is a situation without precedent in the history of the United States.

In other words, if you read this article, you realize that they're liars. This won't get into James Clapper and his lies or John Brennon pushing Russiagate when he's a Russophobe while spying on Congress but truly ask yourself... Do you want to be in the company of these people and their dogs in this hunt?

Finally, the media... The point of this was to distract YOU from issues as Rhania Kalek correctly points out in this video

But notice who benefitted from Russiagate...

Jill Stein was pushed as a Russian agent. Along with Trump. Gary Johnson was ignored.

So the winner was a Russian agent, and a left wing candidate that MSNBC didn't have on during the elections?

Amy Goodman pointed out that Sanders was silenced while Trump was elevated.

“Let’s look at Super Tuesday 3, you had major coverage here at CNN, at MSNBC, at Fox — all the networks across all through the night as the polls are closing,” Goodman said. “You see the concession speeches and the great victory speeches, you see Hillary Clinton, Ted Cruz, Kasich, you see Donald Trump. You’re waiting here at CNN, at MSNBC. They said he’s going to hold a news conference… and that’s it. Where was Bernie Sanders? Well, in fact, Bernie Sanders was in Phoenix, Arizona before thousands of people and as the networks were waiting for Donald Trump and waiting and all the pundits are weighing in, they don’t even say that Bernie Sanders is about to speak.”

So the greatest thing is that the MSNBC failed. Of course, with people like Malcolm Nance who lies all the time and gets rewarded, the ouster of Phil Donahue, Jesse Ventura, and Ed Schultz (RIP) for trying to cover real stories, it's no wonder that they pushed Russiagate for ratings. Overall, the entire point is that Slam Jamming this comes down to three basic points: Do you believe Hillary? Do you believe the "Intelligence Agencies"? Do you believe the corporate media?

To me, the answer is no on all three fronts. And the minute someone decides to show me they believe one, I know they're a liar. So if you want to slam jam like this. Just take this as a long way to say you should be skeptical of idiots pushing propaganda.