you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

He sounded worried, he quit his day job to concentrate on his Substack gig, and now of course the deep state is coming to shut him down. Remains to be seen if he takes a more pro-establishment slant now to preserve his income stream, which was of course the purpose of rattling his cage a little.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sounds like he's going to put some of his content behind a paywall:

I mentioned that it was also about restricting content that was too ‘sensitive’. This means any topic that may attract the mass-reporters like flies and be a lightning rod for “accusations” will serve better being put behind a paywall. This limits bad actors accessing it in order to use it against me in some way.

The biggest issue is the lack of payment alternatives because Substack "is locked into an exclusivity deal in the same way all the tech monopolies today force everyone into their digital ‘walled gardens’."

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Only the 1 article so far, everything else has been viewable by the wider public. The only perk of subscribing before was the ability to have him answer questions in his periodic mailbag.

Obviously they know going back to wikileaks that blocking the common payment systems will starve him of revenue, even if some alternatives still remain. And he wrote in public about dropping his day job to try to make a living with his writing, so they knew he was vulnerable to just this.