you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ageingrockstar 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What do ppl here think about Scott Ritter's dismissal of these WTC theories, on the principle that the conspiracy required would be impossible to keep secret ?

[–]stickdog[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It is a hilarious argument to me. Does anybody have a hard time believing that the Mafia can keep a secret?

[–]ageingrockstar 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Hadn't thought of it that way. So what you're positing is that the necessary actions/preparations would have been put in place by a tight-knit 'deep state' group that would have already been intensely vetted for loyalty to the group on admission and which maintains fierce allegiance (on pain of death) ?

FWIW, I've never really developed an opinion either way. I'm not a US American and have only ever had mild interest in the events of that day. (Actually I resisted the media frenzy around the event at the time and only first viewed footage of the event years afterwards.) I've always been much more interested in how the attacks were used as excuses for removal of rights (including by nations other than the US) and for US war-mongering (which my country to its shame joined in with).

[–]stickdog[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I just have never been able to accept the idea that omertas can only manage to maintain secrecy for certain types of criminals but never for others.

Does this make any sense to you?

Remember that psychological studies prove the the easiest way to get people to agree to deceive is when they think they are doing so for a good reason. So why should it be any harder for intelligence agencies to keep secrets than it is for organized crime syndicates? It's not as if they penalties for telling the truth are any less severe.

[–]ageingrockstar 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah. it makes sense.

I think Scott and Jeff (his Ask the Inspector show manager) are being unnecessarily arrogant in belittling ppl who have theories about the World Trace Centre attacks. It's fine for them to be not interested and say they don't want to engage; it's another thing for them to actively mock ppl who are interested. I still like and respect Scott; he does a lot of truth telling and has been very courageous in doing so. I'm much less impressed by Jeff.