Excerpt:

The video (above) of Dr Phillip Buckhaults’ giving testimony at the South Carolina Senate is all over social media. He is alarmed after finding DNA contamination in the jabs that people actually received (as opposed to the stuff used in the trials), and he is brave enough to speak out on this issue. That’s great news, if it results in halting the continual rollout of this experimental gene therapy (but I won’t hold my breath).

I would like to leave it there. However, Dr. Buckhaults seems to be making some assumptions about the other aspects of the vaccines, such as the longevity and safety of the spike, the long-lasting pseudouridine mRNA and the pro-inflammatory lipid nanoparticles, amongst other things. In other words, the vaccine would be safe if only the DNA was removed.

This brings me to an even bigger idea: many (most?) scientists had tunnel vision in 2020 (many will always have this tunnel vision). They put what amounted to blind faith in The Science TM to deliver a “safe and effective” product and saw everything through this lens, despite the fact that experimental gene therapy had consistently failed to deliver prior to 2020 (so much so that even Albert Bourla admitted he was puzzled by the suggestion that mRNA was ready to be used). Combine this hubris with demands from the mob to “do something” because “no one is safe, we’re all going to die” (provoked by the State propaganda machine and billionaire philanthropaths). Combine this pressure with financial/career incentives and not wanting to rock the boat, even if it’s heading in the wrong direction. Combine this with the fact that many scientists have clearly bought into the authoritarian collectivist mindset/worldview. Combine all of this and more and you have a recipe for disaster - a perfect storm of bad incentives.

In many ways, Dr. Buckhaults’ reminds me of this bigger picture. I don’t really want to pick on him, especially since he is showing signs of wanting to do the right thing now, but he is quite representative of many in the science industry who have enabled this situation; I think his tweets, in particular, are illustrative of some of the bigger problems. For example, he still believes that the experimental gene therapy did more good than harm ...