all 8 comments

[–]Super_Soviet_Gundam 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. WEF. Strong Macron vibes.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think even Vivek trusts Vivek. He knows deep down that he's a con artist.

[–]captainramen🇺🇸🛠️ MAGA Communist 🛠️🇺🇸 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

'No'

[–]ageingrockstar[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

A number of examples are given in the article of Vivek changing his political positions to suit where he currently sees his political advantage lying.

I don't think it takes much research to show that Vivek is a smooth-talking fraud and now that he's getting his moment in the spotlight, we should see more of these sorts of articles, even if they're not mainstream yet (the corporate media are still happy to build him up at this point).

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

A number of examples are given in the article of Vivek changing his political positions to suit where he currently sees his political advantage lying.

Is that better or worse than everyone else on that stage, who have such contempt for their base, and such trust in the bottomless wallets of their donors, that they feel free to openly scorn Republican antipathy to endless Ukraine funding?

I don't trust Ramaswamy, but his (current) stated policies are better than anything else on offer. (Not including Trump.)

[–]ageingrockstar[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I would rather contend with politicians who are consistent in their positions, even if I don't agree with their positions or find them actually evil, than get suckered by a politician who has, through naked self-interest, adopted a position that he thinks will get him support and which is not genuinely held.

On the particular subject of opposing Ukraine funding, the work there was done by others and Vivek is just free-drafting behind them. IOW, he's a grifter. And given his flip-flopping on positions before, there is no guarantee that he would maintain that position once given power if he saw it as no longer in his interest.

Having said all that, I do get your point and I think Trump gets it too. While Vivek is echoing these positions (stop Ukraine funding, anti-woke, etc) he's somewhat useful. But that doesn't mean that we should also ignore that he's a fraud, and in light of that, keep in mind that he shouldn't be trusted with any actual power.

[–]CaelianPost No Toasties 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This joke was popular in 1992:

Did you hear about the Bill Clinton talking doll? Pull the string and it says a different thing each time 😺

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hmm, all that's fair, but it could be argued much of it applied to Trump as well - he just asked Ann Coulter for the galleys of her book and ran on that. Flipped from his public position on abortion most noticeably, one of the reasons he needed Pence on the ticket. Anyway, I certainly wouldn't fault anyone for being skeptical of a guy with even less of a record to examine than Trump had back then, and, as you say, multiple adjustments.