you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]3andfro 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Fancy dancing from the DOJ lawyer [Ms. Honold] defending the FDA in the Marik et al. lawsuit:

Ms. Honold said that the FDA didn’t purport to require anyone to do anything or to prohibit anyone from doing anything.

“What about when it said, ‘No, stop it’?” Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, on the panel that is hearing the appeal, asked. “Why isn’t that a command? If you were in English class, they would say that was a command.”

Ms. Honold described the statements as “merely quips.”

“Can you answer the question, please? Is that a command, ‘Stop it’?” Judge Elrod asked.

“In some contexts, those words could be construed as a command,” Ms. Honold said. “But in this context, where FDA was simply using these words in the context of a quippy tweet meant to share its informational article, those statements do not rise to the level of a command.”

https://covid19.onedaymd.com/2023/08/doctors-can-prescribe-ivermectin-for.html

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

"those statements do not rise to the level of a command.”

So the word "seriously" right before it wasn't really serious?

[–]3andfro 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Apparently not in the context of a lawsuit and a skeptical judge.

But to the public and clinicians, you betcha.

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's kind of a dangerous precedent....

So if they seriously wanted to tell people to stop doing something, how can they possibly tell them, seriously, to stop it?
Seriously...