all 3 comments

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Byron York also notices that something seems off:

 

And two words keep popping up again and again. The first word is: "sprawling."

...

Sometimes the second word was used: "sweeping."

...

This isn't just a commentary on media cliches, although it would not hurt if journalists found some other words to describe what is happening. For some of the media, it's more than that. Calling the indictment "sprawling" or "sweeping," especially doing so over and over, is a way to suggest that Willis has overreached without saying she has overreached.

 

iow, groundwork for a cya if it starts looking like she's going to fall on her face.

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Curiously, Ruth Marcus, a die-cast shill if ever there was one, started getting nervous a couple of days ago:

 

But there is a concern about piling on here. Why stop at Georgia? The federal indictment sets out conduct in six other states in which Trump and his co-conspirators allegedly sought to overturn the election results. Will he be prosecuted in those states, too? At some point, it becomes unfair — yes, even to Trump — to go state by state. That’s why the federal approach is preferable.

 

But it's obviously not a question of fairness. That was thrown out the window 8 years ago. I think she's starting to recognize that the other side is starting to recognize that persuasion, logic, and law are useless at this point.

 

Whatever resolution is reached will be a function of power.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Democrats engage in classic confession by projection, accusing their enemies of what they're doing themselves.