you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Dragonerne did not know he had to say "I like turtles".

Let's just jump past the "he did not look at the messages he received" part and go for the main point:
Does he know now?

[–]AXXA🙏🏿 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

How do you know he received any messages? From his telling of it he didn't know. Whether or not he knows now is irrelevant to the question of lack of transparency that occurred.

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

From his telling of it

Have you gotten any of the other side's "telling of it" with an equal amount of belief in it?

Or an equal amount of "lack of belief or disbelief"?

[–]AXXA🙏🏿 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Have you gotten any of the other side's "telling of it" with an equal amount of belief in it?

Isn't that exactly what I'm doing here right now? Asking questions?

/s/WayOfTheBern/comments/b0h1/a_question_of_free_speech/12reu

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Isn't that exactly what I'm doing here right now? Asking questions?

Exactly? Well, that would depend...

Were you questioning his version of events with the same levels of skepticism and/or gullibility that you have been questioning the other version of events?

That, I have no way of knowing. But it does seem that you were not quite acting in the manner of Al Gore's "honest broker" during the conversations here.

You came in sounding as if you knew what had happened, and it sounded as if you were defending that version of events, rather than "asking questions" to figure out what had actually happened.

Now that it has come to light that at least one tiny part of your perception of their telling of events was proven to be not the correct one, are you planning to go back to the source and "asking questions" in the same levels of skepticism and/or gullibility that you showed here?