you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Zapped 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No need to get into name-calling over this. There are guidelines to conducting discussion on Saidit. Some of those are hard lines that we do not cross and others (namely Pyramid of Debate) that are usually relaxed to give the user the benefit of the doubt. One of the covenants laid out by u/Magnora7 where the moderator agrees to allow discussion, even if they disagree with the user's opinion, in exchange for maintaining a subSaidit here in /all. If the moderator chooses not to abide by this agreement, then they can take the sub off /all. Simple, right? There are exceptions for abuse, but be careful to back up your claim for abuse.

I will reiterate what others have brought up: This rule is in direct response to what Reddit has become and this site is the result of u/Magnora7 wanting to create a freer space for discussion. Also, if everyone agrees with each other here and knows it all, what is the purpose of discussion?

[–]risistill me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm new here. What is u/Magnora7 to this sub? I just found a post or his or hers indicating that u/Magnora7 will be talking to the mods about this. https://saidit.net/s/censorship/comments/b04d/wayofthebern_using_reddit_shadow_banning_on_saidit/12q35

[–]Gravi 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Mag is the owner of Saidit.

[–]risistill me 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Cool. "Mag" said he was going to talk to the mods to ascertain whether the rules of saidit were being broken. Do you know if Mag posted anything about the subject after that?