It only took them 2-1/2 years to find a safety signal from the jab in Germany, and they wonder why the designated body couldn't see it

submitted by kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité from cureus.com

all 43 comments
sorted by:
new (suggested)
topinsightfulfun

[–]0_0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some highlights (emphasis mine):

During periods when many persons were vaccinated, excess mortality seems to have increased more strongly compared to the same periods in the previous pandemic year. During the first and second vaccination periods in spring and summer 2021, an increase in cumulative excess mortality is observed, while the year before a decrease was observed. During the period of the third vaccination, parallel to the increase in vaccinations, an increase in cumulative excess mortality can be observed that starts earlier than in the year before. And in 2022, when large parts of the population have been vaccinated, the cumulative number of excess deaths showed a further increase, which even exceeds the previous pandemic year without vaccinations. There seem to be negative long-term effects either of the SARS-CoV-2 infections, COVID-19 measures, the COVID-19 vaccination, or most probably a combination of these.

...

Inspecting the numbers of vaccinations and excess deaths per month confirms the above impression: Other than in the year before, during the months with a high number of the first, second, and third vaccinations, also a high number of excess deaths was observed.

...

Given the temporal relationship between the increase in vaccinations and excess mortality, it seems surprising that a respective safety signal has not been detected in the pharmacovigilance by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI), which is responsible for the safety monitoring of drugs in Germany. A closer inspection of the methods used by the PEI to monitor possibly deadly side effects of the COVID-19 vaccinations [29] reveals that a flawed safety analysis is used that will not indicate a safety signal even if a vaccine causes extremely large numbers of unexpected deaths.

[–]shatabee5 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I read a bit and then skipped to the conclusions.

As a starting point for further investigations explaining these mortality patterns, we compared the excess mortality to the number of reported COVID-19 deaths and the number of COVID-19 vaccinations. This leads to several open questions, the most important being the covariation between the excess mortality, the number of COVID-19 deaths, and the COVID-19 vaccinations.

Even now, they have merely scratched the surface. Hmm, 🤔, there does seem to be merit in the idea that excess deaths took a major jump.

Congrats! They finally figured that wee bit out. However, the real nuggets are "open questions". Soon...very soon...maybe in the next couple years...they'll try to determine whether covid infection was a cause OR whether the vaccine(yes!) was the cause.

No, warp speed effort trying to expose the crime against humanity that our security state and Big Pharma committed.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (34 children)

Pfizers CEO is a jew

[–]3andfro 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You're flogging that antisemitic horse into the ground with your contentions that people of Jewish background are responsible for most of the ills in social and MSM, government, and the world because of that background, and that "the jew" (your recurring phrasing), regardless of nationality and upbringing, has common attitudes and behaviors. Textbook bigotry, in your case from a questionable book by MacDonald.

Here, you're free to beat that abused equine to death. Just know that many see it for what it is.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

They're a 2% minority. You can deny the coincidences of their overrepresentation, but others will read my posts and start noticing the patterns. Calling out jewish racism and nepotism is not "bigotry", it is loyalty to Humanity.

[–]3andfro 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Overrepresentation is not what you're banging on about.

Nepotism and networking and Yale's Skull and Bones and alum groups of Ivy League schools and the old boys' clubs and executive washrooms and the rest have never been exclusive to a single group, from the village scale to the British royal court.

Again, you're free to call out what you describe as Jewish racism. Others are free to call out what we see as your rabid antisemitism, which does a disservice to humanity by serving the age-old divide-and-conquer tactics TPTB rely on to retain their power.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nepotism and networking and Yale's Skull and Bones and alum groups of Ivy League schools

Funny you say that. Time did an article about Yales secret societies:
https://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2057526,00.html

"Eliezer is much more than a club at Yale," says Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, who is writing the foreword to a book about the society. "It is a global network of activists who care deeply about the Jewish people and about the world."

Also Yale has a student body consisting of 26% jews, which is more than the 20% white student.
Other Ivy Leagues:
Harvard 26% jewish
Princeton 13%
Brown 24%
Columbia 25%
Cornell 23%
Penn 27%
Darth Mouth 11%
All Ivy Leagues have 23% jewish student body on average.
Of these 8 Ivy League universities 7 of them are controlled by jews. What a coincidence.

which does a disservice to humanity by serving the age-old divide-and-conquer tactics TPTB rely on to retain their power.

Naming those in power is the opposite of divide and conquer. It is attacking the very racist identity that keeps them in power. You wont have DeSantis flying to Israel to sign bills to make free speech criticism of "billionaires" illegal, however he will (and did) fly to Israel to sign bills to make naming the jew in power illegal, because he like every single other politician bends the knee to Israel.

your rabid antisemitism

It is not antisemitism to be against racism. You have it backwards. The jews are not special, they are not Gods chosen race, they have no claim to rule over other peoples. Every ethnicity deserves a fair and equal share of representation in the political system and jews are way too overrepresented and it has to be changed.

[–]3andfro 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Meaningless. So are your allegations of institutions "controlled by jews."

You maintain that all people of Jewish background grow up with and move through life with common culture and views. That's hogwash and the essence of bigotry.

Every ethnicity deserves a fair and equal share of representation in the political system and jews are way too overrepresented and it has to be changed.

The working class deserves a fair and equal representation. Women deserve fair and equal representation. Pacific Islanders, Aleuts, Native Americans (who are not monolithic in culture, language, history, or religious beliefs)--all deserve lots they don't have. I won't ask what your "solution" is to all the inequities of underrepresentation. The worst of those inequities derive from socioeconomic class disparities, not other demographic differences. To reiterate: The great inequities across government and other institutions are matters of money, plain and simple.

Now you can explain how the majority of people of Jewish extraction, regardless of their personal beliefs, dominate the 1% and all the sneaky, friends-and-family-favoring means they alone use to get all the moolah and control all the institutions. And don't forget drinking the blood of Christian babies for Passover, an oldie but goodie.

I don't know what got your knickers in a twist about folks with a Jewish background, regardless of whether they consider themselves Jewish or observe the religion in any way, but twisted they certainly are. I almost feel sorry for you. Almost.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So are your allegations of institutions "controlled by jews."

Let's just check the early life of the president of Yale:
"Salovey's grandparents' families originally came from Poland, Jerusalem, and Austria.[26] The Saloveys are descendants of the Soloveitchik rabbinic family.[27] His paternal grandfather, Yitzchak Leib was born in Jerusalem in 1895 to a community worker and pharmacist named Zalman Yoseph Soloveitchik (b. 1874). Zalman Yoseph was the son of Simchah (c. 1830-1921), a Lithuanian born Jew who emigrated to Jerusalem where he was called "The Londoner", due to the time he spent living in London. Simchah was the son of Eliyahu Soloveitchik, an uncle to the famous scholar Rabbi Yosef Dov Soloveitchik, known as the Beis Halevi. This part of the family's origins trace to Kaunas (Kovno/Slobodka), Lithuania and then Volozhin, Belarus. "

It is not "allegations". It is fact. You can call these facts meaningless but they are facts nonetheless.

To reiterate: The great inequities across government and other institutions are matters of money, plain and simple.

Not only money, although money is a big part of it. We deserve fair representation in positions of power. Jews being 33% of Bidens administration is not fair representation.
Money is only one part, a big part, but only one part of the equation. Power is important as well and every group deserves to be fairly represented. This includes women, pacific islanders, whites and others.

Now you can explain how the majority of people of Jewish extraction, regardless of their personal beliefs, dominate the 1%

I never claimed that.

I won't ask what your "solution" is to all the inequities of underrepresentation.

I'd want jews included in affirmative action. Include a category called jews and limit their representation to their fair share of the population, just like every other group of people. What I want is for jews to be treated like everyone else.

I also want usury banned. No more capitalist lending at interest to exploit the working class. The current monetary system is based on debt. It is debt slavery. Make 1 hour work = 1 coin. Force the billionaires to do actual work to earn a living.

Do you think any of these are unreasonable? And if so why?

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Dragonerne: ...others will read my posts and start noticing the patterns.

That may already be happening.
But not in the way you think it is.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can only do my best to educate others on what I believe the truth to be. If others disagree, I am open to change my mind, however thought ending word clichés like "bigotry" and other emotional outbursts will only strengthen my resolve. I am best influenced by logic and facts and it is also my method of persuasion.

The reason why I choose this approach is because even if, let's say 90% here will disagree with me, they will still have been "infected" with the facts, however they might incorporate these facts into a different context than me, because they come from a different intellectual background, which is only natural. What I believe will happen over time is that in a few years, some of these 90%s who refuse it now, will experience something that their eyes simply cannot deny. This will allow them to tap into the wealth of knowledge about jews that I am providing them with and their previous perspective of jews will be re-analyzed and they will have the facts available to see the nuanced picture rather than just generalizing the "billionaire" or the "system" without further intricate context or complexity.

What saddens me is that many who call themselves socialists, don't actually care about changing the system. They will rather defend the billionaires than name them.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

The fact that someone is jewish doesn't actually tell you anything about them as a person.

For example, the modern writer who both exposed the horrors of the Talmud to a modern audience, and rather conclusively proved that covid-19 was a USA bioweapon is Ron Unz. Who is himself jewish. And didn't know anything about the Talmud until he researched it, upon which he was so horrified by what he learned that he wrote a series of English articles about it.

[–]MartiniPlease send olives! 🍸 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

horrors of the Talmud

This? https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-oddities-of-the-jewish-religion/

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

One of, yes.

[–]captainramen🇺🇸🛠️ MAGA Communist 🛠️🇺🇸 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You have to treat this guy like a crackhead on the subway. Just stare straight ahead when he starts his psychotic babbling

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

But, like with a crackhead on the subway, you do have the option to delve. To glean what afflicts him.

[–]3andfro 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"Evolutionary psychologist" Kevin MacDonald is what afflicts him, according to an earlier post.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Speaking as an evolutionary psychologist myself, the problems that afflict modern humanity began +6,000 years before a bunch of backwards desert sheepherders started calling themselves Israel.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

The fact that someone is jewish doesn't actually tell you anything about them as a person.

https://files.catbox.moe/xw7xgk.mp4

Yes it does tell you something about them as a person, however there is variability within the jewish population. Do you understand probabilities? Blacks have an average of 85 iq but that doesn't mean that intelligent blacks don't exist.

The talmud is absolutely horrific.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Blacks have an average of 85 iq

All that means is that Blacks are bad at taking IQ tests. Not surprising, the IQ tests were designed to produce this effect.

Here's a hint: humans didn't evolve intelligence for the purpose of doing abstract mathematics and physics problems. We evolved intelligence to manage complex social relationships for the purpose of having and raising children.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Did you watch the video? And do you understand why being jewish does tell you something about his person now?

All that means is that Blacks are bad at taking IQ tests.

Yes, but not all of them. Some blacks score very well on IQ tests. This was my point and argument.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Some people can open a beer bottle with their asshole. Just as meaningful, since that's not what an asshole is for.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Did you watch the video?

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I haven't decided yet. As I'm sure you can tell, I have read a number of things in line with what you're pushing, but I don't seek out that sort of material.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Understandably, it is not an easy truth to swallow. I felt the same reluctance for years

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I simply find it isn't helpful. I have spent my entire adult life studying and trying to understand what humans are, how we behave, and why. An answer of it's all the jews' fault isn't helpful, because it doesn't explain anything. It's also demonstrably false. On a financial level, the effects of usury and unchecked lending for interest were known and countermeasures were written into law +1000 years before the Jews even emerged as a people.

The first city-states that appeared 10,000 years ago all had fortifications, and these people manifestly conducted wars against each other to steal their land and property. They justified this using the prototype for what we now call 'religion'. Again, thousands of years before Israel appeared as a people. So no, blaming Jews for everything isn't an explanation of anything at all. This is not to excuse the crimes against humanity of Jewish neocons in USA, and the crimes of genocide of the modern state of Israel. These fuckwits are going to get us all killed.

[–]3andfro 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Blacks have an average of 85 iq

A highly questionable statement that's impossible to validate, even with large sample sizes, given the world's population and the scores of factors that affect raw IQ.

Gotta hand it to you for efficiency, combining antisemitic and racist remarks in one comment. What other ethnic groups do you have sweeping statements about? What generalizations do you make about your own demographic niche on the H. sapiens family tree?

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Facts aren't antisemitic or racist. However jewish supremacy is racist, which I haven't seen you call out yet.

The 85 iq average is the Afro-American IQ average and has been measured for 100 years.

Reading your comment, I question if you even know the difference between generalizations and averages? Lol.

[–]3andfro 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

"Facts" are selective and open to manipulation and interpretation. The roles of nature and nurture in IQ are still being studied.

Problems with standard IQ tests including bias have been acknowledged for decades.

I was paid to double-check data in papers presented and accepted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. Lol.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The roles of nature and nurture in IQ are still being studied.

It doesn't change the numbers. You were questioning the number.

Problems with standard IQ tests inclulding bias have been acknowledged for decades.

Yes, in favor of blacks. But even if true, it doesn't change the numbers.

I was paid to double-check data in papers presented and accepted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. Lol.

I don't care. Peer-review is elitist gate keeping of science and capitalist barriers. We saw how "peer review" worked during covid. So called "science" is a political scam by the globalist elites who control the universities and these institutions, and we know who control those lol.

[–]3andfro 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

As I wrote:

Problems with standard IQ tests inclulding bias have been acknowledged for decades.

IQ tests are recognized as having limited value and validity. That isn't news.

Of course peer-review is elitist; I've posted Einstein's issues with it many times on the WotB reddit site. Data review is important regardless of the publication. And no, "we" don't know who controls "the universities and these institutions."

As I've stated, you're free to sling your old-school anti-Semitism and racism around this free-speech venue. Fortunately, your attitudes are blatant.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

IQ tests are recognized as having limited value and validity. That isn't news.

But it doesn't change the numbers which was why I mentioned it, as an example of having an average and outliers from that average.

Of course peer-review is elitist

I can recommend this short video about "science", his channel in general is very good:
https://odysee.com/@RogueScientist:c/SOURCE-what-Science-can-and-Cannot-tell-you:3

Einstein

Another jew.
I don't believe in his theories. You should look into the Michelson-Morley experiment. What I would recommend is to find the actual original paper from the 1800s, read it and then afterwards read how modern propaganda tools reframe the experiment, like wikiepdia or science textbooks. They invert the cause and effect of the experiment. It is sophistry. The reason I say to read it in this order is because otherwise your reading of the original paper will be biased by our modern "understanding".

Fortunately, your attitudes are blatant.

I am very honest and I seek the truth. If you have truths that direct me in a different way, I will be persuaded. I am motivated by fairness and truth.

[–]3andfro 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Your jew-hating lens interferes with much.You put down peer review. I mentioned Einstein's thoughtful (and correct, imo) objection to peer review. Your response? Object to Einstein, who sides with you on that topic, because he's "another jew" and someone whose theories you don't believe in. You couldn't take the win of having "another jew" agree with you even on the failings of peer review. Then you claim, astonishingly, that you're "motivated by fairness and truth." On the evidence, that has as much validity as Fox News' description of itself as "fair and balanced."

Again on the evidence, you have a skewed image of who you are. That's your business, but it's relevant to your insistence that you're a truth seeker without bias.

You're not worth additional keystrokes.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This paper does a reasonably deep dive into the math behind 'excess deaths' in Germany, and finds, unsurprisingly, that from 2020 through April 2021, there were virtually no excess deaths. Then, after the jab rollout, excess deaths were 2 standard deviations above the norm in 2021, and 4 for 2022, including for youth who were in no way affected by covid. They also mention stillbirths, also rising with the jab campaign.

I guess Pfizer doesn't have the money to keep this sort of paper out of journals anymore.

Conclusions:

This study used the state-of-the-art method of actuarial science to estimate the expected number of all-cause deaths and the increase in all-cause mortality for the pandemic years 2020 to 2022 in Germany. In 2020, the observed number of deaths was extremely close to the expected number, but in 2021, the observed number of deaths was far above the expected number in the order of twice the empirical standard deviation, and in 2022, above the expected number even more than four times the empirical standard deviation. The analysis of the age-dependent monthly excess mortality showed that high excess mortality starting from spring 2021 is responsible for the excess mortality in 2021 and 2022. An analysis of the number of stillbirths revealed a similar mortality pattern than observed for the age group between 15 and 80 years.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Interesting, I have looked through Danish data and we don't see any excess mortality-- well we do, but this is due to changing demographics, so if you correct for # of people in each age group and look at the average death rate of people in those age groups, then you see no significant changes, at least in Denmark.

[–]0_0 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Funny enough Denmark was one of the countries with less restrictions in Europe during the pandemic and one of the first to finally admit that the virus wasn't going away and people would have to learn to live with it. Even during early 2022 when they had a huge spike in cases you could still go out and live your life.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even during early 2022 when they had a huge spike in cases you could still go out and live your life.

Not if you were unvaccinated. I couldn't even go to the gym or movies. But the vaccines and lockdowns failed to flatten the curve, so at least they stopped the restrictions around early february 2022

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

From the article:

Given the temporal relationship between the increase in vaccinations and excess mortality, it seems surprising that a respective safety signal has not been detected in the pharmacovigilance by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI), which is responsible for the safety monitoring of drugs in Germany. A closer inspection of the methods used by the PEI to monitor possibly deadly side effects of the COVID-19 vaccinations [29] reveals that a flawed safety analysis is used that will not indicate a safety signal even if a vaccine causes extremely large numbers of unexpected deaths.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So the Germans followed the American example, and they rigged their vaccine monitoring system to use a nonsense mathematical formula that would never return a 'safety signal' even if a vaccine was killing tens of thousands of Germans. Which this one did.

Makes me wonder when this sleight of hand was implemented?