you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Musky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Exactly it doesn't make sense, which is why I would like you to provide the CNN link you reference

That's a comprehension mistake on your part. I said you won't believe anything until a CNN article tells you it, not that there was one. Why would CNN produce actual news counter to their propaganda?

You should really learn how to evaluate the crap links you dredge up on your confirmation bias missions

You know why it's believable, because it's exactly the kind of shit the US does.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

exactly the kind of shit the US does

In other words: the linked articles aren't enough to demonstrate your assertion...there's another part to convincing me of a US coup: I have to additionally believe your worldview about it being the kind of shit US does.

You're acknowledging that the articles you linked don't actually prove a coup - but only when they're read by someone who already believes your worldview about this being something the US does.

So why did you link the articles as though they were proof. Why did you accuse me of being unable to do a search - when now we're realising that the links don't actually prove your assertion unless they're read by someone who already believes the US did it. That's called confirmation bias.

So you don't actually have any proof of a US coup. Now you admitted it, fucking stop saying it. You're minimising the patriotism of the thousands of Ukrainians who decided without American input to go out and protest. You're literally incorrect and spewing ruzpropaganda. You're knowingly doing confirmation bias and trying to gaslight me that I just am not doing searches correctly

You mean CNN hasn't come out with an article saying Ukranian leaders have been bribed

Not a mistake on my part: you asked, whether I meant that CNN hasn't come out with this article. So either link the article or acknowledge that the mistake was on your side not mine.