all 9 comments

[–]Femaleisnthateful 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Apparently the number 25 is some sort of transphobic dog whistle. Ha!

[–]xoenix 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

[–]Haylstorm 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ofc they are. Trust the science didn't work this time so now it's the science that's mean.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pfft, when are they not?

[–]ClassroomPast6178[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Holy shit the tears!

[–]cephyrious 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"she rejected 42 out of 43 scientific papers and rejected all witnesses or expert testimony if they happened to be trans"

Imagine spouting such utter nonsense.

[–]bife_de_lomo 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The fucking cheek, Labour pushing the Tories to get off their asses, after obstructing change and pushing this shit at every turn.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're career politicians whose only goal is to keep their asses employed, did you really expect them to stand firm on their previous position now that it looks more like a noose about to hang them than a ladder they can climb into office?

[–]xoenix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There must be some transhausen parent Labour MPs who were not ok with this.