This is a good point and the NYT loves to spin a narrative. The most recent egregious example is the whole "screams without words" article which has been fully debunked at this point and it turned out to be written by an IDF intelligence operative... But they still refuse to take the article down. They published a new article which essentially agrees with the conclusions of the grey zone and the intercept but somehow still say they stand by the original article. It's like... What?