Ah yes, women, famous for beating up and terrorizing men. That poor, poor, poor soyboy.

submitted by QueenBread from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]QueenBread[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's a lot like saying a chicken always loses to a fox. Nah, it's not true, because if the fox is blind, old and diseased, and the chicken is big and strong, the chicken once in a while can ward off the fox. Therefore, chickens and foxes are equally dangerous, and chickens shouldn't fear foxes. Therefore, we don't need fences to separate foxes from chickens. Let foxes inside a chicken's den.

[–]BluuDegenerate 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I still can't decide if it's dishonest or moronic, but it's plenty entertaining watching you read words that aren't there and draw absurd conclusions that nobody is saying, instead of just looking at the situation through a reasonable lens and going "yeah okay it's possible for a woman to be the abuser"

[–]QueenBread[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's also possible for a chicken to win a fight versus a fox. The real issue here is WHY it's so important for you to focus on that event and to have people say that a fox can lose to a chicken, while most normal people don't even think about that possibility and are concerned about protecting chickens from foxes.