use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
Seen a horribly oppressed transethnic otherkin blog their plight? Wept at how terrible it is for the suffering of multiple systems to go unheard every day? Been unable to even live with the thought of the identities of someone's headmates being cisdenied?
Then you've come to the right place!
Confused? Here's a moderately helpful dictionary of terms.
How to find good TiA material!
Before posting please check the known Satire/Troll Wiki
Remember to use Nitter for Twitter links!
Join the SocialJusticeinAction discord!
Women who kill their newborns are deeply unwell, so why are they being tried for murder?
submitted 7 months ago by wylanderuk from theguardian.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]cephyrious 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago (1 child)
The article argues that they should be tried for infanticide, not "regular" murder. Infanticide is still criminal. Actually, the definition of infanticide includes the word "murder", but sentencing is slightly more lenient than regular murder. It's a fair argument.
[–]LtGreenCo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago (0 children)
sentencing is slightly more lenient than regular murder
That's seems ass-backwards to me. If anything, it should be more punishing. You murdered a defenseless child.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]cephyrious 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]LtGreenCo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)