you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Results: Both experiences of being bullied and perpetrating bullying were more commonly reported by transgender youth than by cisgender youth. Among transgender youth, all involvement in bullying was more commonly reported by non-binary youth than those identifying with the opposite sex. Logistic regression revealed that non-binary identity was most strongly associated with involvement in bullying, followed by opposite sex identity and cisgender identity. Transgender identities were also more strongly associated with perpetration of bullying than subjection to bullying.

Read that last bit again and the pause for the conclusion the author is about to make.

Conclusion: Transgender identity, especially non-binary identity, is associated with both being bullied and perpetrating bullying even when a range of variables including internal stress and involvement in bullying in the opposite role are taken into account. This suggests that bullying during adolescence may serve as a mechanism of maintaining heteronormativity.

Yes sure, bullying was invented to maintain heteronormativity. THAT'S THE FUCKING CONCLUSION YOU COME TO?

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is how scientists get their papers accepted.

You write an abstract that is favorable to the narrative and a discussion or conclusion that is favorable to the narrative - but your data and results say the exact opposite.

Many papers during corona was like that: "More research is needed to shed light on the risk benefit analysis and we recommend the vaccine"

I had a laugh reading your comment, good job.