you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is how scientists get their papers accepted.

You write an abstract that is favorable to the narrative and a discussion or conclusion that is favorable to the narrative - but your data and results say the exact opposite.

Many papers during corona was like that: "More research is needed to shed light on the risk benefit analysis and we recommend the vaccine"

I had a laugh reading your comment, good job.