use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
Seen a horribly oppressed transethnic otherkin blog their plight? Wept at how terrible it is for the suffering of multiple systems to go unheard every day? Been unable to even live with the thought of the identities of someone's headmates being cisdenied?
Then you've come to the right place!
Confused? Here's a moderately helpful dictionary of terms.
How to find good TiA material!
Before posting please check the known Satire/Troll Wiki
Remember to use Nitter for Twitter links!
Join the SocialJusticeinAction discord!
Trans. Isn't. A. Contagion.
submitted 8 months ago by xoenix from midi.moe
view the rest of the comments →
[–]superiortocissiesthose poor TDS victims ;-; 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago (6 children)
:3c transgenderism has about 1% incidence rate i don't know about the amount of ppl living in three-person households but that alone would make 1 per million of them all trans
also, two of them are related which rises the odds sgnificantly.
the only weird thing i see is timing /shrug
[–]alladd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago (5 children)
There's around 340 million people in America. About 1 million or so identify as trans. That's less than 1%. Closer to a third of a point.
Assuming trans is "random", that means you have about a 1 in 340 chance of being trans.
Being related shouldn't affect that likelihood, since, as claimed, it's "not a contagion" and thus isn't subject to influence. So it would be 1/340 each time, for each person, no matter their social situation.
So the chance of three trans people happening in the same spot is 1/340 * 1/340 * 1/340, or about 1 in 39,304,000.
[–]superiortocissiesthose poor TDS victims ;-; 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago (0 children)
it being random is the worst case scenario which is clearly not the case for the reasons i've described above
just assuming trans people will only chose other trans people or accepting cis people as partners makes them concentrate way more (one possble reason for being accepting is being trans oneself)
[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago (3 children)
If we're talking about the actual condition, it's genetic. And even if we're not, other behaviors are also based on genetics.
[–]alladd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago (2 children)
Nope. It's never been proven in any way shape or form to have a genetic origin, or to even be a real thing. Many trans are against the idea of using brain scans to try and prove it is, too, probably because some of them know deep down it's not.
Also, makes no sense for you to claim here, since a genetic disorder would be subject to true probability like I demonstrated, and would not be influenced by proximity to other people with those genetic markers.
[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago (1 child)
It's not been proven, but few things have. However there's an interesting correlation between trannies and mutations in certain genes that control hormonal processes.
But, this correlation ONLY applies to trannies with dysphoria. Which is why they don't want it researched, because a) it proves that a large percentage are faking it, b) it's evidence that this is a disorder and a bad thing.
[–]alladd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago (0 children)
I would like to see a study supporting this because I've never heard of anything close. The closest I've seen are those "gendered brain" studies that were since dismissed as bad science.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]superiortocissiesthose poor TDS victims ;-; 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]alladd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]superiortocissiesthose poor TDS victims ;-; 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]alladd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]alladd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)