you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NormalPear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Minors having sex with similar aged minors? Or prepubscent minors? If the not latter, I support it.

[–]bucetao6969Ace Spectrum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I think it's like. If you have two 15 year olds and the age of consent is 16 both get arrested.

"Support" what. It's not the two that should get arrested it's the parents.

edit: Wait you want 13 year olds having sex with each other???!!!

[–]NormalPear 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think it's like. If you have two 15 year olds and the age of consent is 16 both get arrested.

Ah. It would be ideal for minors to NOT have any intercourse at all until 18. But, that's not now reality works.

"Support" what. It's not the two that should get arrested it's the parents.

Why should the parents get arrested? They didn't force them to do the deed. That be like arresting the parents because their kids decided to commit any other crime. The minor knows exactly right and wrong, and made the conscious decision to do that.

Wait you want 13 year olds having sex with each other???!!!

Mate, what you're going on about? I'm talking about 15/16 year olds. You know, those who have entered PUBERTY. Literally what the specified ages we/I were discussing. Which again, ideally, there should be no intecourse until 18. But, that's not going to work.

[–]bucetao6969Ace Spectrum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why should the parents get arrested? They didn't force them to do the deed. That be like arresting the parents because their kids decided to commit any other crime. The minor knows exactly right and wrong, and made the conscious decision to do that.

The minor DOESN'T know "exactly" what is right or wrong because they're a minor. The parents should get arrested for negligence that allowed these 2 to have sex below age of consent.

Mate, what you're going on about? I'm talking about 15/16 year olds. You know, those who have entered PUBERTY. Literally what the specified ages we/I were discussing. Which again, ideally, there should be no intecourse until 18. But, that's not going to work.

You said you support "prepubscent having sex" (whatever the fuck that means) which means pre-14 years old

[–]NormalPear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The minor DOESN'T know "exactly" what is right or wrong because they're a minor. The parents should get arrested for negligence that allowed these 2 to have sex below age of consent.

Mate, teengers are at a point where they DO KNOW right and wrong. Are you really going to help me that the wittle teenger who willingly steals and gets 91 yr old granny killed "didn't know better"? These teens know what they're getting into. Even with the watchful eye of their parents. Even when they were told, "no sex until marriage," given education, resources, or none at all. Guess what... They still find ways to do it! You're just trying to remove accountability from them.

Plus, you need to learn to reread... Because Jesus, man.

What I wrote in my 1st comment:

Minors having sex with similar aged minors? Or prepubscent minors? If the not latter, I support it.

My "pro arrest" is for teengers, 15/16 years old, who go on to have "consensual" intercourse with anyone prepubscent.

I wrote IF NOT THE LATTER. You know what that means? NOT THE SECOND OPTION. What's the second option? PREPUBSCENT minors.

Any pubescent minor having "consensual" intercourse with PREpubscent minor should be arrested.

[–]NormalPear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, going to reply about your gross accusations towards me?

Because accusations like that are serious, and tossing them around like it's a game, helps actual child predators to get pass.