My Research on Gender Dysphoria Was Censored. But I Won’t Be. Retraction of scientific articles is associated with well-deserved shame: plagiarism, lying, etc. But my article was not retracted for any shameful reason. It was retracted because it provided evidence for an idea that activists hate.

submitted by Chipit from (thefp.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]chottohen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Keep submitting it to other journals. Re the mock paper "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" about which authors Paul R. Gross and Norman Levitt claim that some humanities journals will publish anything as long as it has "the proper leftist thought" and quoted (or was written by) well-known leftist thinkers: All Things Considered, 1996. The quote is in an interview on the Sokal Affair that embarrassed a prominent academic journal for publishing a parody paper on postmodernism that made it through the peer review process. The reason, imo, was that no one really understood what postmodernism was anyway. I say this to mock academic journals. Good luck to you.