The MAP stuff is a mix of people on the conservative side playing slippery slope straight to the bottom, being correct in their conclusion but usually failing to properly explain how people can slide all the way down and coming across as extremists in the public eye.

Then there are the LGBT activists who do point out that if we accept the "I'm born that way" argument for homosexuals it may also just as easily apply to pedophiles, which is correct, and that a hypothetical pedophile who doesn't ever actually pursue their desires hasn't done anything wrong and society might be better off by "accepting" that such things exist and not stigmatizing people who seek therapy for it, which is also true imho. But this then strays into the problem of gay acceptance in the first place, whereas we can say it's needlessly cruel to forcibly try to convert gay people to be "normal" does the same not ring true for pedophiles?

Of course then you also get the NAMBLA types coming out of the woodwork who not only unequivocally support pedophilia but want it entirely destigmatized so they can have easier access to new victims. They've always been there too. And they'll gladly try to guilt parents into thinking they are backwards whateverphobes and intolerant biggots for noticing some sketchy stuff going on.

Normal people will avoid the appearance of sketchy stuff as much as possible.