Very succinct explanation.

They don’t see 6 as a problem because they will have made sure that the law/policy punishes the “racist”/“sexist”/“homophobic” as if they were “racist”/“sexist”/“homophobic” under the old definitions of the words and not the new ones. So the loyal Lady-in-Waiting to the late Queen is thrown under the bus by Buckingham Palace as a vile racist for asking another lady dresses in a somewhat offensive pastiche of “African” dress with a name that is what someone with little knowledge of Africa would recognise as nonsensical, where she comes from.

The loyal Lady-in-Waiting is allowed to make no arguments in defence of herself, the accusation from the “African” caricature is all that matters in the eyes of her employer and the media. The media acts as if the loyal Lady-in-Waiting had donned a white hood and screamed the hard R n-word in the face of an innocent little old black lady, because they wilfully substitute the meaning to suit their purposes.

It’s how a blatantly racist comment “The balcony is terribly white” after the coronation on a live broadcast is allowed to slide despite it not only being blatantly racist, but actually fucking meant to be racist the woman who said it actually meant that a family that was all white was terrible. But that was acceptable to the media who acted like the people making a fuss were the racists.