you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Godknight 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Or maybe men should just dress like men. Then we'd also not have this 'predicament'. As the Bible warned us 4 thousand years ago.

[–]QueenBread[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're following the rules of a fictional book written 4 thousands of years ago. 'Nuff said.

[–]Godknight 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yup and people back then knew what a woman was. You people always underestimate the intelligence of ancient civilizations.

Just follow the science guys.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People back then also threw people to be torn apart by wild animals for fun.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's also not actually a rule

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, because women wearing battle armor for pagan rituals is the same as them wearing pants out of preference.