“I was not aware the Transgender community expects fealty and total agreement with all their beliefs and any variation or deviation is considered ‘transphobic,'” ~Dee Snider

submitted by Alienhunter糞大名 from (kron4.com)

all 17 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]BISH 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The tweet resulted in Pride dropping Snider from its main stage where he was set to perform his ’80s hard rock anthem, “We’re Not Gonna Take It.”

Dee has another classic jam that he could use instead...

Twisted Sister - Burn in hell (lyrics)

[–]Alienhunter糞大名[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Round and round the purity spirals we go. Let's find out who will be the last one standing on our new hit reality TV series "Earth: A silly planet"

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Do you think faggots and queers are aliens from another planet?

[–]Alienhunter糞大名[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Faggots come from the planet Toba Ko in the Kantzar system.

Queers are extra dimensional space whales from the dimension of So Shal Me Dia.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Good, let the troons and their janissaries strip away every ally who doesn't blindly agree with them. That leaves more nuts to step into the spotlight who will, hopefully, alienate even more of the moderate supporters in turn. If it happens enough, then even the densest normie should be unable to ignore the insanity any longer.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I wonder if, in a decade or so, when we look back on this fucked up era of shemale shenanigans, we will see that the tipping point was Dylan Mulvaney’s skinwalker turn in the spotlight as the cavalcade of Troon sex offenders were paraded before our eyes but ignored by the mainstream media. That it’ll be the fact that the media were saying things that were clear to normies as being untrue and the normies reached the limits of their tolerance for this - the tolerance they developed during the gay marriage/rights debate.

If I were gay I would be very worried that all the good will had been squandered so that a few mentally disturbed fetish-possessed individuals could grift and inveigle their way into positions of power.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Gay people used to be very much concerned with their image for good reason. The younger generation I think doesn't remember how things used to be and take it for granted as an excuse to be annoying assholes essentially. There was an onion article years making fun of earnest people going to pride and getting disgusted at what they saw about how it's about sex.

Essentially though I think the bullying just shifted form, used to be people bullied relentlessly any kid that was perceived as gay. Now there's fat more conciousness towards that sort of bullying so the bullies adapt towards taking on gay characatures so they can claim they are offended and get school authorities to do the bullying for them by proxy. Classic blackmail essentially.

Definitely a concern that the blowback from this could turn quite nasty. People make the gay issue into something of an identitarian debate where in reality it's one of government authority over the private sphere. Namely that adults have the right to make decisions concerning who they want to live with, totally independent from the issue of sex or relationships which isn't the purview of the government to enforce outside of somewhat narrow criteria such as rape. (In other words from the point of view of the government two men living together shouldn't be subject suspicion as in the eyes of the government, and frankly society as whole, they shouldn't be legally distinct from any sort of roommate situation, same for heterosexual roommates or other non-marital relationships)

There used to be a lot of resistance within gay circles to the idea of legalized gay marriage as well since bringing in official government recognition of marriage also opened up the potential for government regulation of it as such. I'm not entirely sure I agree with that position. As frankly I see it as socially beneficial for gay people who choose to be together to have the same access to the mutual stability a marriage contract can provide in such situations. There's definitely a lot of truth to the idea that bringing extra public attention to the gay community is going to result in a social backlash forming that might serve to erase any gains made especially if it progresses faster than society is ready to handle and problems begin to form on the fringes that aren't properly handled.

I've argued this since the early 2000's at least but very few people were interested in the idea. The conservative arguments against gay marriage were of course largely a simple appeal to traditionalism and biblical religious arguments which I didn't accept, but there were some legitimate concerns brought up largely removed from the popular debate, mainly dealing with things like common law issues, divorce, international reciprocity, and the like, which were ignored where I said unless such issues are given proper thought and solutions to the potential issues are decided beforehand, they will cause issues that will lead to backlash forming and public opinion shifting.

There's also the simple issue in the United States at least where the legality of homosexual marriage was decided via judicial intervention rather than through democratically introduced legislation or public initiative, which had the unfortunate effect of gay marriage being legal in large portions of the country where it was extremely unpopular, this naturally leads to resentment, makes people feel it's forced upon them, and contributes to a forming public resistance which ultimately threatens the progress made towards public acceptance of gay marriage in the first place. Nothing good can come from the kind of overtly public displays of sexual behavior and fetish type content. It will foement public outrage which will view (rightly) the exhibitionists as a threat to the public order and a threat to their children, and of course there will be no distinction in the public outrage between them and the non-offenders who keep things in private with only those people who are all consenting adults. Especially since the former will drag them all out into the open and into the crosshairs of public outrage under the pretenses of pride.

[–]OuroborosTheory 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

yeah we've discussed something this: the gays also didn't run around banging pots and pans yelling "Ed Savitz and Randy Kraft are gay! and we're gay just like them too! don't silence our voices!" (I mean some hybristophiles and bugchasers may've, but they got kiboshed without anyone fussing that it was "respectability politics" or "heteronormativity")

but now whenever someone rapes a baby or his half-senile mother and grows out their hair there's a dozen comments by undergrad girls (or the boys trying to get in bed with them) screaming don't you dare misgender HER: the only thing worse for the trans would be going door-to-door with a crime-scene album and telling your neighbors "this is the work of a trans woman, and this page too--now can you promise me to associate trans women with all of these foul crimes?"

[–]TheMaharishi 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's a lot of words to say nothing of relevance.

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Verschlimmbessern in action.

/u/jasoncarswell

[–]slavdude0 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was not aware

Then you're nothing more than a moron who doesn't pay attention to what you support.

You have a tiny bit of Ts who are aware what they are and who don't want to associate themselves with the "community". Rest of them in the "community" are lunatics.

[–]xoenix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"I was not aware."

Ok.

[–]clownworlddropout 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's all about control and they know that their grip is tenuous, so they feel like they can't let up even a little bit because they're afraid they'll lose it all if they do.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're right of course. If you've got a losing hand your only hope of winning is to bluff enough that your opponent blinks.

It's a standard tactic of online arguments. Had one try it today.

"You're literally closer to an ape in intelligence than the gentlemen you're talking shit about. Maybe shut the fuck up and listen to them attempting to dumb it down for morons like you instead of thinking you can guess your way through existence."

Just have to applaud that. Classic reddit response. I like to call it the "tweaker on the subway" gambit. You see in a normal debate there are certain rules of decorum that must be followed. For example for some bizarre reason it's considered rude for example, to call my opponent a "nearsighted slime rancher with delusional dictatorial aspirations who has the very striking profile of the majestic gorilla and a fecal throwing ability to match".

Now if I open my debate with that, then take a shit on the podium and run around screaming with my pants down about how the Jews like to eat babies while simultaneously doing the helicopter (because that's how I identify bigots!). Naturally I will automatically win the debate, my opponent will determine that I am clearly too dangerous to tangle with in a battle of wits, leave fearing for their life, and that means everyone present in the audience will be so impressed with my clearly superior intellectual display of prowess they'll obviously make me their king then and there! Obviously. Anyone who would dare disagree is probably some simple minded fool who can't see how majestically splendid those magic imperial raiments are.

[–]Femaleisnthateful 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gender ideology is a house of cards which will tumble with the slightest prodding.

[–]cephyrious 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Every corrupt ideology forms purity spirals where you have to be more and more extreme to prove you are a true believer, and the more extreme it becomes, the harsher it handles dissent. Witch burnings, sharia law in Islam, both Soviet communism and the anti-communism (McCarthyism) etc etc.

[–]UncleWillard56 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The mental gymnastics around transgenderism is fucking awe inspiring. You weren't born a woman in a man's body, buddy. At best, you have a gene issue around hormones that makes you feel that way. Why we aren't looking for treatment for that instead of treating the symptoms and making this some political nonsense is beyond me.

Also, we need to stop using the term "transphobic" and use the correct term, "transmisia." I don't fear trans people. I don't even hate them. I hate trans activism for propagating this lie that somehow because you think you're a different sex, you have some kind of authority over other people. You don't.