use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
Seen a horribly oppressed transethnic otherkin blog their plight? Wept at how terrible it is for the suffering of multiple systems to go unheard every day? Been unable to even live with the thought of the identities of someone's headmates being cisdenied?
Then you've come to the right place!
Confused? Here's a moderately helpful dictionary of terms.
How to find good TiA material!
Before posting please check the known Satire/Troll Wiki
Remember to use Nitter for Twitter links!
Join the SocialJusticeinAction discord!
LOL WUTTurns out that slippery slope is real - three people recognised as legal parents of a child on birth certificate.
submitted 1 year ago by ClassroomPast6178 from dailymail.co.uk
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Wanderingthehalls 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
There are two issues here. The only parents on a birth cert should be the biological parents. The biological mother and the biological father. And I guess in cases of a gestational surrogate with another woman's egg, that also needs to be recorded. A birth certificate is a factual document for the child and nobody's ego should come ahead of that. (I know it's easy to falsify who the father is, but we should be looking at using technology to make these certs more accurate. Not butchering them.)
The second issue is about legal parenting. In a same sex couple I have always felt the non-bio parent should be able to adopt the child so the family unit has legal protections. But I do think realistically, that needs to be restricted to two parents. We have to have boundaries somewhere. And our whole family legal system is based around two parents, as that is the norm. Custody issues, for example, are hard enough to deal with already. Adding a third legal parent to the mix, just creates a multitude of potential issues that make creating a fair situation for a child nigh on impossible. This is fucked up in two ways.
[–]Ehhhhhh 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
In a way, seems like another example of them taking away womens' rights.
Why are they trying to erase women?
[–]Enemycupcake 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
How would this relate to women's rights? Like because there's no female on the birth certificate or something else?
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
Probably because it requires a woman to give birth and then they just erased her from the birth certificate.
[–]Enemycupcake 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Makes sense
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Wanderingthehalls 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Ehhhhhh 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]Enemycupcake 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Enemycupcake 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)