you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cephyrious 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Graham Linehan on substack said it best: "In his lifelong effort to reframe his porn addiction as a civil rights issue, and his men’s rights activism as feminism, Colin Montgomery performs a perfect inversion of the truth in the hope of carrying out a remote control swatting at the hands of America’s lunatic fringe."

[–]ClassroomPast6178 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

It annoys me when it’s referred to as “men’s rights activism” because it’s nothing to do with the issues facing men and it is just yet another use of “men’s rights” as a slur. It’s entirely possible to be concerned with both men’s and women’s rights.

It’s fetish/mental illness by largely unpleasant men supported by large numbers of women using the philosophical underpinnings of gender theory from feminists like Judith Butler.

I give Glinner a bit of a pass because they have literally driven him mad by removing every aspect of his life (and blaming him for it) but every time he brings up troonery being “a men’s rights movement” just makes me disregard what he has to say.

I’m not an MRA, but having worked in health and education there are serious issues affecting men and boys that get swept under the carpet because “men’s rights” has been turned into a slur by feminists and the craven politicians.

[–]pacmanla 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

👏👏👏