you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ClassroomPast6178 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don’t think that shows Google has an opinion on the issue of a trans genocide, just that it’s scraped Wikipedia. Wikipedia is just defining a term that is used by academics, it quite clearly says that “Transgender Genocide is a term used by scholars”.

And, finally, there are lots of terms used by scholars that are dubious or contentious. Part of being an academic is doing shit like that.

I hate being an apologist for google, wiki or scholars, but there’s nothing wrong with that as it is, as far as I can see from the pic you linked.

I bet if you googled Sasquatch you’d get a similar definition….doesn’t mean google or wiki believes in the Sasquatch.

[–]fuck_redditThou/Thee/Thy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

“Bigfoot” gets a card but it says “alleged by cryptozoologists”