LOL WUTHans get ze flammenwerfer - Drag act and bondage routine at event for babies.

submitted by ClassroomPast6178 from (dailymail.co.uk)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

But organisers defended it, insisting it was carefully curated and suggesting the babies would not understand what was being performed

God that's a stupid argument.

You gonna defend mommy and me hardcore pornography viewing because baby can't understand it?

Why not molest the baby directly? They are too young to understand it.

Here's a thought, your logic is just indefensibly evil?

[–]ClassroomPast6178[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

They just don’t get it. In their minds they’re doing nothing wrong because their entire world view is so possessed by their Queer Theory ideology.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they didn’t use the retrospective argument, that they, as adults, wish that they, as children, had been exposed to the things that they currently enjoy - therefore they’re doing those children a favour by giving them those things. The fact is that they, I think wilfully, forget that as children their desires were entirely different and beyond that we as a society agree that children should not be exposed to.

The problem is that the ideological possession is so strong, and the taboo against calling out misbehaviour by the LGBT crowd, means that this shit gets defended by the usual useful idiots in the media and anyone opposing it is painted as far right.

[–]LyingSpirit472 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Clearly, these people should've listened to their mamas.

Mama always said, anal sex is a lot like spinach. If you're forced to have it as a child, you're not going to like it as an adult.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I did see their response to the outrage was to blame it all on "trolls" definitely totally blind to why it caused outrage.

Regardless, even if we give a best faith assumption for their intentions, that does mean they are so incredibly ignorant they'll be blind to the child molesters as well. I feel like they are purposely conflating the right wing outrage types that will get offended at drag in the first place with the people complaining about there being literal babies there.

I think the drag performance here is strange and tasteless, but if it's an adult performance for adults whatever, I don't give a fuck. Why are there babies?

[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Regardless, even if we give a best faith assumption for their intentions, that does mean they are so incredibly ignorant they'll be blind to the child molesters as well.

Even then, the best faith argument is worthless because, as these people are completely blinded by queer theory, they cannot be blind to the child molestors; rather, they expect and celebrate the child molestors and actively want to give them something to get their cummies from (it scares "normal" people to see their child molested, so therefore it's inherently good and needs to be brought to the world.)

To these people, if the baby can't understand it, the baby not only needed to be molested, but the molestor should be risen up as one of the only true heroes on this or any other world.

[–]SerpensInferna 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

So if the baby doesn't understand it what is the entire point of bringing the baby to it?

These people are too retarded to live.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Mm

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think it's fair to bring the baby to certain things it doesn't understand so the baby can learn. Like a petting zoo. Or if there's a mommy and me cooking class or whatever. The problem isn't that they baby needs to understand what's going on. The problem is they're doing adult Cabaret style sexed up performances around literal infants. We don't know what effect that will have on the kids. Same if you showed them hardcore pornography. Babies won't understand it but they are still far too young to see it. The effect of it on the developing brain could be bad.

Babies are too young to tell us if something has traumatized them or not. Hell shit like Halloween costumes will scare the fuck out of babies sometimes because they can't tell the difference between a guy dressed up like a monster vs an actual monster. Same stuff in the kids mind.

I'm not saying we go completely soft on the kids and keep them from anything that's scary or troubling to them, but that's a very different thing than bringing your kid to a drag show, or a strip club, or hell a titty bar. (And babies definitely aren't going to be scared by the sight of tits).

It's got nothing to do with the gay shit and everything to do with the whole, you are willingly taking your kid to a fucking adult entertainment event, for kids? So that some pervert can get their rocks off performing in front of literal babies?

If I were in charge everyone involved with this except for the babies would meet justice at the end of a rope.