you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Newzok 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Hey, we all knew. I was as astounded as anyone how much of a soft stance was taken on this. If you remember, there were even posters that were very sex-positive that said, like, shag away but if you think you got it call this. Clown world. Gays won't riot if you tell them there's a very gay specific illness out there and to be careful for a little bit.

[–]ClassroomPast6178[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

We can shut the world down for a year, but don’t you dare tell the gays to maybe lay off the chemsex bareback orgies! The only thing more insane from an infectious disease control point of view was the way that lockdowns suddenly didn’t matter when BLM were “peacefully protesting”.

[–]Newzok 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well yeah. It's really odd what has priority and what doesn't. And when the population in question raises an eyebrow over how it's handled...

I mean, so much here that we discuss seems to come from the same type of policy or rhetoric. Is this another ESG/DEI case? It's rotted its way into every part of government and media?