you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Shouldn't you not be bothering the normies?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Don't I leave the good ones alone and keep the pressure on the bad actors?

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Nobody here is involved with your life savings, Havana Syndrome, go1dfish, or Notabug. They just hate trannies.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Shouldn't anyone who denies the connection between notabug and saidit be able to answer why "NAB" is still listed on every single webpage produced by saidit?

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Because nobody maintains this fucking site.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Wouldn't that be struck down in court if my case were to proceed there? Shouldn't a website maintainer probably remove things that would create liability?

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You don't have a case.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Didn't I just prove you wrong though? Didn't you say that no-one has anything to do with notabug? Aren't you patently wrong as pretty much any legal scholar would agree? Isn't every single webpage produced by this website actually in fact directly associated with notabug?

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No to all.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Aren't you just lying? Can't I just search "NAB" in my browser and see two instances of it in the footer? Couldn't you probably do the same if you put your mind to it?