all 79 comments

[–]clownworlddropout 24 insightful - 5 fun24 insightful - 4 fun25 insightful - 5 fun -  (25 children)

Nothing says "authentic self" like blatant mimicry.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (24 children)

Aren't they just learning behavior which those with high estrogen levels are conditioned to do?

[–]clownworlddropout 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

No. Humans have behaviours and instincts like every other animal, and like every other sexually dimorphic animal some of these behaviours and instincts are synonymous with the two different body types that comprise the species. What they are doing is learning to mimic the opposite sex, something that also occurs in nature, typically as a mechanism for gaining access to females that would otherwise be unavailable to them.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

Shouldn't any behavior that increases sexual competition be celebrated by culture, especially those that hold tightly the principles of unfettered capitalism?

[–]clownworlddropout 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Does only asking ridiculous questions make someone sound like a fool?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Wouldn't I look like more of a fool if I bothered an esteemed man with unnecessary retorts?

[–]clownworlddropout 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

🤣

[–]1-800-FUCKOFF 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

You think you sound smart, but your comments are borderline-retarded, unintelligible drivel.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Isn't your response just classic jew nonsense, get the picture yet?

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Shouldn't you not be bothering the normies?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Don't I leave the good ones alone and keep the pressure on the bad actors?

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Nobody here is involved with your life savings, Havana Syndrome, go1dfish, or Notabug. They just hate trannies.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Shouldn't anyone who denies the connection between notabug and saidit be able to answer why "NAB" is still listed on every single webpage produced by saidit?

[–]Wanderingthehalls 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. They are trying to learn the behaviours of a cartoon. Women don't flutter their eyes and give everyone slow, warm smiles. We in fact do dismissive smile and nods, when we meet people who we acknowledge we know but don't want to engage with. Men do big warm smiles when they see someone they are happy to see. And nobody flutters their fucking eyes. These men are larpers who haven't a clue what real men and women are like because they are disengaged from reality and just utterly fixated on their own ridiculous notions of what manhood is and how they aren't it. And that womanhood is everything opposite that.

[–]1-800-FUCKOFF 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's his point...?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Didn't he refute my question? Aren't you kinda sorta failing to grasp the conversation?

[–]LtGreenCo 17 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 4 fun -  (34 children)

Go ahead and unlearn all the guy-mannerisms you want. It won't make a difference; you'll still be repulsive trannies without a shred of real femininity.

[–]SerpensInferna 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah these two are prime examples of uncanny valley creepy, even from just small pictures. They just scream for anyone with survival instincts to stay clear.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The one on the bottom has that troon-pattern baldness going on up front there.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (31 children)

Aren't you just acknowledging that youth should have freedom to consume whatever HRT medicine they so please in their own privacy?

[–]LtGreenCo 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (30 children)

No idea how you arrived at that conclusion from what I wrote.

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I do, he's schizophrenic. It's sad. He's been doing his impersonation of the Socratic method, maybe you noticed everything is in the form of a question.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Didn't we go on to have an entire conversation? Didn't you choose to add this gaslighting remark in the middle of it?

Couldn't you probably notice that I left him alone eventually because he proved himself to be a decent person, unlike yourself?

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Didn't we go on to have an entire conversation?

I dunno dude, I didn't read it, just concerned you're gonna wear everyone out with your Socratic bullshit like you did in chat.

Couldn't you probably notice that I left him alone eventually because he proved himself to be a decent person, unlike yourself?

I don't know what the fuck I ever did to you. I just get random accusations from you.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't know what the fuck I ever did to you. I just get random accusations from you.

Didn't I clear your name with regards to the Jason scandal? Aren't you kind of strawmanning my position on you?

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Weren't you just calling me a fed again the other day? I don't know which imaginary scandals I have cleared of or not.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Aren't I, right here and now, clearing your name?

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I thought you were just trying to hurt my brain.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

Wouldn't youth HRT treatment result in better outcomes much more indistinguishable from these cherry-picked examples of transgender individuals?

[–]ClassroomPast6178 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Nice use of the word “youth” to obfuscate the true word - children.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Shouldn't children be afforded all the freedoms of liberalism granted their parents' prior approval?

[–]ClassroomPast6178 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Shouldn't children be afforded all the freedoms of liberalism granted their parents' prior approval?

That’s some paedo logic right there. Conveniently ignoring the fact that children are malleable, approval seeking and have no sense for permanence when it comes to choices they make.

We rightfully do not allow a child to get a tattoo, even with parental permission, so why should we agree for them to be castrated/spayed and pumped full of experimental hormones in service to a bankrupt ideology?

Hey Groomer, leave them kids alone!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Can't children just give themselves stick and poke homemade tattoos? Doesn't it really all just boil down to freedom to make medical decisions in the privacy of one's own home?

[–]ClassroomPast6178 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You’re Keffals and I claim my £5.

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]LtGreenCo 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

No form of transgenderism is a good outcome. They are all bad. If you want good outcomes then teach these kids to just accept the cards nature dealt them, stop wasting money on drugs and plastic surgery, and focus on things that actually matter in life.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

Couldn't we find agreement that the costs should not be publicly funded? Aren't you just subjectively interpreting other people's choices? Isn't the freedom to consume whatever drugs and medicine one so pleases in the privacy of one's own home just the cornerstone of liberalism?

[–]LtGreenCo 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I only commented on best outcome, not restricting freedoms.

But if you want me to talk about what should be legally allowed? I'm pretty liberal. If a grown adult who understands the risks wants to go ham on trannydom then sure, go for it. Feel free to look and act as ridiculous as you want as long as you aren't imposing on others.

Kids aren't ready for it though, even if the parent is okay with it. Same reason as a society we legally don't let kids gamble, smoke cigarettes, etc., regardless of what the parents think. And if you need evidence that it's not something a child is ready for, then the umpteen thousands of depressed and ruined people in the detrans community are a good start.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Children don't have the freedom to consume whatever drugs they please. Neither do adults. We know certain drugs, like opium, have a large net negative social impact as well as their huge negative personal impact and so we restrict them. It's utterly stupid to assume that there's some universal unrestricted right to consume whatever drugs one pleases.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Making laws for people "for their own good" is a well-known sign of a tyrannical, big-brother nanny state.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

It's not "for their own good" it's for the good of society at large.

I don't give a fuck if someone wants to kill themselves with opioids or cut their own dick off. I do give a fuck if that someone then wants me to pay for their support afterwards, or starts going around stabbing people at convenience stores to fund their habit.

There's a fine line between government nanny state tyranny and broadly beneficial policy. I tend to agree a lot of the drug war is done appalling bad to no results, but there's a reason why "nanny states" like Singapore where chewing gum is banned have you unlikely to be murdered if you go for a walk.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I do give a fuck if that someone then wants me to pay for their support afterwards, or starts going around stabbing people at convenience stores to fund their habit.

And both of those are the fault of government. I shouldn't have to explain why for the first scenario. The second one happens because since drugs are banned, drug addicts have to buy them for extreme prices from gangs or the mafia, from whom they face barbaric threats if they fail to pay off one penny.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's utterly stupid to assume that there's some universal unrestricted right to consume whatever drugs one pleases.

Wouldn't it be silly to stand in front of a semi-truck traveling 80mph? Aren't we just doing precisely the same thing by pretending that a 21st century drug war is even remotely possible? Couldn't you just worry about drugs that affect people's ability to operate machinery instead of trying to prevent people from accessing hormones and abortifacients?

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's illegal to stand in front of a semi-truck traveling at 80mph. We can't begin to take reasonable steps to enforce it or stop all people from doing so if they are suicidal, but it doesn't mean we should pretend that society should take no steps to prevent suicidal retards from dragging society down with them.

One reason why freeways and bridges have guard rails to make it hard to jump or fall off.

[–]Athelhilda4 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I have no idea what fluttering eyes are either, and I’m a woman. Does he mean eyelashes?

[–]LyingSpirit472 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think it's that thing you see in movies where you look up at someone and keep blinking a few times to show how twuuuu your wuv is for them or how innocent you are, really. Considering that's how they get their idea for gender roles, makes the most sense.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That "'sup dude, you good" and "'sup dude, all good" head movement that guys use when it's not formal enough for a handshake, and they're not familiar enough for anything else. It basically combines acknowledgement of the other's presence, a polite greeting, and an equally polite dismissal.

[–]FlyingKangaroo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Imagine being so deep into sexist stereotypes you associate little nodding with being a man. So much for dismantling le evil patriarchy and gender binary!

Nodding or not, he will never be a woman.

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's an almost imperceptible bob of the head men give each other in silent greeting.

[–]thoughtcriminal 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nod down for formal acknowledgment, nod up for informal.

[–]deusex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"fluttering my eyes"? What the fuck. Are you supposed to be a Looney Toons character?

[–]shadeviking 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, nodding. THAT'S how people could tell you were a man miss megamind 🙄

[–]SMCAB 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They still are a man and look like a man. They should stop confusing themselves and lying to others.

[–]alladd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Eryn's got a sixhead

[–]shortchick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I nod back at people. I guess I'm a man now according to these people.

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Rule 30. There are no girls on the Internet.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Men nod up or down depending on whether they are friendly or aggressive.

[–]1-800-FUCKOFF 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Damm girl, look at the hairline on Eryn...

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I am, but I can't see it, it's too far back!

[–]cephyrious 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The gentle nod you do when you acknowledge the presence of someone else. Usually you nod "up" when it is someone you know well, and nod "down" when it is someone you don't know.

[–]Kalkazar13 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're talking about "the nod of acknowledgement." But it's not like un-learning it is going to make them women.

[–]couch 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dunno but my best guess its that nod you do to your friends in middle school