even the praised Minnesota Multiphasic test's "gender identity" questions are just stereotypes like "are you able to understand interior design?" "are you the one doing the shopping in the house?" I have nothing feminine about me whatsoever and still got HALF-AND-HALF

problem for them is the Current Year view of gender includes BOTH 1. dysphoria--the overwhelming need to change everything about sex--AND 2. genderfluidity, which John Money's sick experiment was literally trying to prove (but instead allowed dysphoria to be codified)

once you see this, it starts showing up everyhwere: mainstream feminism says the sexes are equal ... and that the sexes are the same; radfems, that men being advantaged is patriarchy, but also that women being given an advantage is ALSO from the patriarchy since they're being patronized; or whether bi is like homosexuality or just people lying about something invisible to horn in on the gay bars; or or or

the contradictions crop up when you pay attention for more than the length of a slogan, but they're usually presented in isolation and sound semi-reasonable (unless you're looking for contradiction, and that's called "sealioning"): I think it's also because these Mandatory Dogmas come from very small university departments, who write the Freshmeat 101 courses and mandatory sensitivity thingies: the other departments teach the required electives, but don't force everyone to agree to Ibn Khaldun's Law or speech-act theory or else they can't enrol

now add together Sophomore Syndrome where they just find out about somthing, youth, free time, social media, and Cluster B and you have the never-ending vampire castle of "SJWism" (a word I myself don't like)