you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

But who are they trying to depopulate, the US? I don't see Africans, Chinese, or Indians trooning out and they all have substantial populations.

[–]RedEyedWarriorThe Evil Cishomo 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because those populations are not falling for this bullshit. White people could have used collective force to stop this shit from happening. We failed. So now we are reaping what our parents and grandparents have sown.

[–]jet199 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think I saw some stats that in Canada natives are the group most likely to transition in childhood. This might be because a lot of their kids are in care so the social workers can groom them into it.

In more conservative groups like Africans and Indians the trans kids are mostly the effeminate gay boys.

Edit: of course forgetting the Jews. They have far higher rates of autism so I assume higher rates of trans as well.

[–]Haylstorm 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I mean even without grooming being in care often means you're more likely to be abused. I can def see it being a victim defence mechanism to try and escape sexual abuse too...

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Abuse is also associated with being disassociated from your body which is another trait common in trans.

[–]Haylstorm 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tbh they should probably investigate when someone says that. Not saying it's always the case but I'd think abuse before I think actually trans. Especially with the reputation being in care has. You're already more vulnerable so it feels more likely that it's abuse for many.

Not that they will because things barely ever happen with abuse in care.

[–]LyingSpirit472 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The Chinese also have had their population control with the one-child policy and saw it blow up in their face because if families can only have one child, they'd rather have a son- meaning now, if anything, they NEED LGBTQ promotion to try and sate all the spoiled, entitled little emperors that this formed.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nah LGBT is heavily suppressed in China. Homosexuality isn't illegal per say but that's about the extent of "gay rights" there.

China doesn't need to pursue social policies to satiate it's incels. They have both high rates of incarceration as well as one of the world's highest execution rates. People who are disruptive to Chinese society and become a problem for the government will quickly be removed from society and cease to be people.

[–]LyingSpirit472 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

While I agree with your concept on paper, it seems unlikely that's the case.

With how China and Russia are trying to make moves to annex countries, it's more likely they keep their incels so frustrated and bitter, then sic them on nearby countries and tell them "kill everything you see with a dick and forcibly take a war bride and you'll finally get the sex you feel you deserve."

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Chinese territorial ambitions are mostly maritime so unless they expect them to become pescosexuals I doubt that plan will work.