use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
Seen a horribly oppressed transethnic otherkin blog their plight? Wept at how terrible it is for the suffering of multiple systems to go unheard every day? Been unable to even live with the thought of the identities of someone's headmates being cisdenied?
Then you've come to the right place!
Confused? Here's a moderately helpful dictionary of terms.
How to find good TiA material!
Before posting please check the known Satire/Troll Wiki
Remember to use Nitter for Twitter links!
Join the SocialJusticeinAction discord!
Who needs evidence?
submitted 1 year ago by zpgnbg from i.imgur.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Horror-Swordfish 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
Whatever happened to "trust but verify"? There's a world of difference between assuming that EVERY alleged rape victim is making it up and that EVERY alleged rape victim is telling the absolute truth. Of course you don't want to immediately dismiss someone that says they've been raped, but I don't think it's wrong to ask for some kind of evidence, especially if you're about to ruin someone else's life and reputation over those accusations.
[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
There's not usually a way to prove someone was raped is the issue. It's often one person's word against another unless it was violent, and even then it can be argued that even that was consensual. Then you gotta look at her character and her sex life, in court, to see if a consensual encounter would be likely. It's traumatic for a genuine victim.
But obviously we can't just throw men in prison and ruin their lives because people lie, and people remember things wrong, particularly with drugs and alcohol, but also with head injuries and even just time.
[–]LyingSpirit472 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Honestly, that's why more needs to be said that there's a difference between Not Guilty and Exonerated.
Not Guilty means "maybe he did it, maybe he didn't, but it's too close to call and we can't prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that he did...so unfortunately, he goes free...but that DOESN'T MEAN the victim lied, just we can't prove it conclusively."
Exonerated means "He didn't do it. We can prove conclusively he could not possibly have done this. Let it be said by this court, and spread throughout the land, this person is 100% innocent, he did not do it, and if anyone tells you that he did do it they are 100% a liar!"
In a rape case, that difference is VERY IMPORTANT.
[–]LyingSpirit472 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Trust but verify? That sounds like something a WITCH would say! WITCH! He's a witch! BURN THE WITCH!
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Horror-Swordfish 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]LyingSpirit472 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]LyingSpirit472 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)