DISCUSSIONWhat is worse: the troons or their apologists?

submitted by [deleted] from self.TumblrInAction

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Newzok 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah definitely. But is it because its perceived that this is how people want it through what media says, i.e Twitter having disproportionate influence over policy, or some lobby group or both?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think it's definitely a combination of both. Money is a powerful motivator, and it's more likely than not that a medical lobbying group, especially with how profitable pharmaceuticals are in the US, was influencing things. The social media aspect also pushes the narrative of "acceptance" and "inclusion", so money + emotion = the perfect medical scandal. I think it's going to get worse before it gets better, and it will be some time before all the apologists come to see the trans craze for what it really is.

[–]Newzok 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think so too. My pet theory on here is that there will be a huge wave of detrans women speaking out about how they were led to cut their tits off by doctors, shrinks, media. But I wonder if the culprits will get theirs.