TRANSGENDERInvalidating a males neovagina is more violent than actual violence

submitted by [deleted] from (i.imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 24 insightful - 3 fun24 insightful - 2 fun25 insightful - 3 fun -  (15 children)

A serious question here.

Would you prefer if I told you that the reason I am not interested in sex with you is because you are trans? Or would you prefer I simply tell a half lie and say it's because you are unattractive and ugly? Perhaps telling you I think your personality is ugly is better? Or will that cause a disphoria because you identify as a nice person?

Or are these supposed reasons never really stated? I'd expect in 99.9% of situations that you are getting rejected softly with normal white lies like, you aren't my type. Rather than the unstated meaning of that which is more like "you look ugly to me".

[–]IridescentAnaconda 22 insightful - 9 fun22 insightful - 8 fun23 insightful - 9 fun -  (6 children)

The correct answer is: you are not allowed to say no.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

But no means no. And I don't even have to give a reason. But if you must ask for a reason, know the reason is because you asked for a reason, which shows a disrespect for my own autonomy and is by it's nature consentphobic.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 18 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Don't you understand? Saying "no" is violence. It calls out for a legal solution. He wants it to be illegal to not fuck him.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No means no. Not dropping the issue after constitutes intentional sexual harassment and I can file a legal complaint there.

[–]RedEyedWarriorThe Evil Cishomo 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Which is rapey, but troons don't care.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think they do care but they like it that way.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The correct answer is: you are not allowed to say no.

It's like the jab.

Except, this time they want you to jab them... in the pseudopussy.

[–]LyingSpirit472 14 insightful - 8 fun14 insightful - 7 fun15 insightful - 8 fun -  (5 children)

Honestly, the other half of the answer (independent from, as said, the "you're not allowed to say no to them" fact), is that these are insane narcissists.

Because they're insane narcissists, they will never accept those reasons as the truth. You can say "You are one of the ugliest women I have ever seen, and I've been on safari tours in San Antonio. And I could forgive that if you were a pleasant, nice person to exist with and had a personality that was beautiful, but you don't. You are literally human excrement, but saying that is unfair; at least a piece of shit could grow a crop to feed a hungry person, or even a pretty flower that will put SOME beauty into this cold, cruel world filled with people like YOU in it. And even just asking the reason means you're not just a rotten person who's uglier than sin, you're also a creepy, rapey POS too so you can't even take no for an answer. You have literally no positive qualities surrounding you except a warm hole to stick your dick into, and you're so utterly repulsive in every way, shape, or form I'd sooner heat up a tin of Spam and stick my dick into that than put it inside you. If they made me put a flag over your face and fuck you for Old Glory, I'd join ISIS just to refuse it. If you were the last woman on earth, and I was the last man on earth, and the future of humanity depended on us reproducing, I'd charter a boat into the open ocean and dive in just so you don't get the satisfaction of being able to fuck my corpse." ...and these people would hear that diatribe and respond "...so, it's because I'm trans then."

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Honestly, the other half of the answer (independent from, as said, the "you're not allowed to say no to them" fact), is that these are insane narcissists

Well yes. Anyone who would respond with shock and try to guilt you into having sex with them is an insane narcissist obviously.

The rest will make you look like the insane person. While I can certainly appreciate the surrealist comedic aspect of it. I trust you are socially competent enough not to attempt that strategy in real life and not expect a bunch of white knight types to jump to "her" defense. Though perhaps one of them will allow themselves to be coerced into non-consensual sex in order to show how virtuous they are.

[–]LyingSpirit472 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly, even the surrealist aspect is just the same. No matter what excuse you give to reject them, they'll say "so, because I'm trans. Got it."

And the second part...that just won't happen. Remember. The white knights who'd jump to her defense try to shame other people into non-consensual sex with a trans person because they know damn well they wouldn't fuck them themselves.

[–]RedEyedWarriorThe Evil Cishomo 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well said. They want to be the victim so badly they'd even make up transphobic incidents just to have something to whinge about.

[–]LyingSpirit472 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, not even so much that as "they truly believe them not getting their way is a hate crime". And honestly, they'd be like this no matter their minority group- they're just a piece of shit.

[–]FourteenDigitz 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

is that these are insane narcissists.

This is even scientifically verified

The findings of this study revealed that the prevalence of personality disorders was higher among the participants, and the most frequent personality disorder was narcissistic personality disorder (57.1%)

[–]FourteenDigitz 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or will that cause a disphoria because you identify as a nice person?

This right here is the crux of the "self-identity" issue. If someone that literally everyone thinks is a massive asshole identifies as a nice person, is it bigoted to call them a fucking asshole? What's the line between words that we allow to have meaning and words that can be used for self-identification?

The answer is that reducing the meaning of any word to self-ID isn't a slippery slope, it's a flat fucking plateau where ALL words are arbitrary, convey no meaning, and are just means of self-ID

[–]TotoroDeams 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The correct answer is to not play the game.

They are crybullies so either tell em how it is and understand a large group will hate you or just lie and say you have a significant other and you don't cheat.