SANITYNYT Publishes a Gender Critical Article
submitted 1 year ago by xoenix from (nytimes.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
"The Far Right and Far Left Agree on One Thing: Women Don’t Count"
Yeah, that title doesn't fit the article. The article describes how the entire left (including its big, apathetic Kony 2012-style center) has fallen under the transvestites' spell.
[–]JasonCarswellSisyphus / Ouroboros 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
I know lots of women who can count.
[–]r2d2_21 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
Isn't the far left in support of the transgender movement? Or amI missing something?
[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
That's the basic thrust of the article- how the political left's embrace of transgenderism is bad for women. I wouldn't say it's just the far left. Transgenderism has leached into the bland, vague leftism that we've come to just assume is a prerequisite for employability in "developed" countries. Corporations don't just stop at "LGB" when they genuflect before the altar of Pride Month, anymore.
My larger point was that the part about the political right (brief mention of Roe v. Wade) seems tacked on, and insufficient to justify the article's title. It's kind of like, we're supposed to already know that the political right doesn't care about women, and NYT is careful to make sure that part's still mentioned in passing. I mean, they'd hate to be mistaken for Republicans.
I suspect an editor asked for that part to be added to the article (and the authors of news articles seldom have input into headlines anyway).
[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
In support of woman erasure.
They can't even define the word "woman" any more. Because it exposes how incoherent their ideology is. Hence the frantic attempts to censor Matt Walsh's movie in which he asks a bunch of far left "What is a woman?" and lets them hang themselves with their own rope. It's very damaging and instead of realizing this and changing, they've got to censor.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
Seen a horribly oppressed transethnic otherkin blog their plight? Wept at how terrible it is for the suffering of multiple systems to go unheard every day? Been unable to even live with the thought of the identities of someone's headmates being cisdenied?
Then you've come to the right place!
Confused? Here's a moderately helpful dictionary of terms.
How to find good TiA material!
Before posting please check the known Satire/Troll Wiki
Remember to use Nitter for Twitter links!
Join the SocialJusticeinAction discord!
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun - (4 children)
[–]JasonCarswellSisyphus / Ouroboros 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun - (0 children)
[–]r2d2_21 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)