you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]IMissPorn 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It was a bit weird to lead in with abortion, at least in the way she did it; as if the two issues were similar. Still, it's good to see a mainstream (i.e. leftist) publication dared to share this.

[–]xoenix[S] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I assume she's a typical (of 10+ years ago) liberal who just doesn't buy into gender theory. If it's any consolation, the comparison is seriously triggering the TRAs.

[–]Objecting_Sphere 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you're going to write about women's issues in the NYT these days, it is mandatory to lead with Roe vs Wade. That said, I actually appreciate what the author is trying to demonstrate here: People who care about traditional feminist issues, like abortion, should also be concerned about the way trans activists want to erase the idea of women, making everything gender-neutral at the expense of women.