use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
Seen a horribly oppressed transethnic otherkin blog their plight? Wept at how terrible it is for the suffering of multiple systems to go unheard every day? Been unable to even live with the thought of the identities of someone's headmates being cisdenied?
Then you've come to the right place!
Confused? Here's a moderately helpful dictionary of terms.
How to find good TiA material!
Before posting please check the known Satire/Troll Wiki
Remember to use Nitter for Twitter links!
Join the SocialJusticeinAction discord!
LOL WUTWhen our biologically based aversion to incest that helps preserve our species survival is too “ableist” and isn’t “woke” enough.
submitted 1 year ago by BioEssentialism from pprincette.tumblr.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]BioEssentialism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago* (3 children)
Homosexuality is probably some kind of disorder
No, it’s just another natural wiring or else it wouldn’t be seen in most species.
and they evidently still have reproductive instincts, or they wouldn’t mate at all, like myself.
No if they had reproductive instincts they would quite literally be straight, or even bi.
Is this your way of saying you’re asexual?
For what it’s worth I personally think it’s the exact same gene that contributes to all these different reproductive mitigating orientations such as homo/bi/trans and yes even ace, but just manifested differently. (Or maybe not to as strong an extent as in the case of bisexuals)
[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
Other species don't have disorders?
Then why do they try to mate? That's an instinct designed to make a person reproduce, even if it's not their intended goal.
[–]BioEssentialism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago* (1 child)
Correct so homosexuality shouldn’t be considered a disorder.
I believe there’s a certain reproductive inhibiting gene out there that manifests itself in different ways - some of it is complete asexuality and the absentation of sex itself, another way is still having that sexual urge but directing it towards the “wrong” gender, and still others is the individual in question having a brain that is more wired akin to the opposite sex which causes severe body dysphoria and makes them cease using their reproductive organs.
Regardless of how it manifests the end result is still the same: prevent a selected portion of the population from reproducing at all costs in order to maintain species-wide population stability.
[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago* (0 children)
By that logic nothing is a disorder because everything is for natural selection's agenda. No matter how terrible of a burden it is on the individual, as long as it's meant for natural selection.
Luckily abnormal sexuality isn't usually problematic but that doesn't mean it's intended.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]BioEssentialism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]BioEssentialism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)