you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]GConly 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

. Some of the posters on the original superstraight aired out the trans movement dirty laundry about all the death threats and whatnot they've been sending, and all the "enjoy the girldick" memes (barf). Many straights such as myself had never seen the extent of that

That was the main reason gendercritical got banned. It made sense, it exposed their threats, their homophobia and how they were negatively affecting women. Clearly, no slurs, just facts.

It very much was a trans narrative busting sub.

[–][deleted]  (20 children)

[deleted]

    [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

    Yikes, calm down weirdo.

    [–][deleted]  (18 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

      Tinfoil hat phobic.

      You do know intergenerational wealth is kind of a myth, right? There is only about a 30% chance that amy generations wealth sees it to their grandkids

      [–][deleted]  (16 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

        Sigh.

        2/3 millionaires hit zero meaningful financial help from family as well.

        The odds of getting anything from your rich great grandparents is about 10%.

        Jewish higher income is down to just bring brighter. It's why they make up such a chunk of novel winners.

        [–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

        Jewish higher income is down to just bring brighter. It's why they make up such a chunk of novel winners.

        Wrong. Please show your proof of this. It has been demonstrated several times that their overrepresentation cannot be explained with higher intelligence. They are simply too few compared to their overrepresentation.

        [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

        It has been demonstrated several times that their overrepresentation cannot be explained with higher intelligence.

        Wrong, please show your proof of this.

        My data is that with an average IQ of 111, and verbal IQ of about 125 as a group, they'll produce about 4x to 64x functioning geniuses and super producers. It roughly doubles as group IQ goes up five points.

        However, verbal IQ is way more relevant to income and achievement than non verbal. So I'm not entirely sure how that would affect the multiplier.

        Your turn.

        [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

        Jews don't have 111 average IQ. Israel has below 100.

        A small subgroup of jews have 111 average IQ. 4x is not enough to observe the data. With 111 mean, they have 2.66% above 140, which is 7 times that of mean 100 and with 125 mean 41 times that of mean 100.

        Even with those numbers, they do not match what we observe. Not even if ALL jews were Ashkenazi jews, which they aren't.