School lunches will never be good.

It's better than starving. I know first-hand how crappy it can be, but I'd rather eat a piece of square pizza that tastes like card-board than go all day hungry.

Far better to get families to learn and provide healthy food on the cheap which suits their kid's individual needs.

Some of them can't, because they're poor, or won't, because they're too busy shooting up meth. I've known a lot of kids who relied on free school lunches (back when they were determined by income) and plenty of kids who were denied free lunches, but couldn't afford to buy them.

In neither case is it the child's fault, in neither case should the child be punished, in neither case should the child go hungry. I know way too many children who had to go hungry for one reason or another, and it pisses me off when people say they don't deserve to eat.

But that's difficult and dosen't give liberals instant good feelz.

And it leaves kids hungry.

And no, not everyone who supports this is a Liberal; there are plenty of Conservatives, like me, who actually care about family values rather than shilling for billionaires — yanno, the people pushing abortion, open borders, and other liberal agenda.

It also highlights which kids are being abused and neglected which upsets the notion poor kids fail due to finances alone, we can't have that.

So you're fine with kids starving just so you can own the libs?