you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I never understood the "Feed the Children" foreign aid charity. Why would you want to save a bunch of kids that are going to grow up to be terrorists and kill your children or grandchildren. In this case do we really need more useless eaters that reproduce indiscriminantly and on the taxpayer's dime.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I never understood the "Feed the Children" foreign aid charity. Why would you want to save a bunch of kids that are going to grow up to be terrorists and kill your children or grandchildren.

I'm against foreign aid because American taxes should go to American citizens — especially when so many of our own are in poverty — but you shouldn't blame the children of terrorists for their parents' crimes. I agree on the policy, but not the sentiment.

In this case do we really need more useless eaters that reproduce indiscriminantly and on the taxpayer's dime.

Calling children "useless eaters" pisses me off, to be honest. Everyone was a child at some point in their life, and all children under a certain age are innocent — or at the very least incapable of understanding their sinful actions — so to say they don't deserve to eat is pure evil. No child should be punished because their parents are too poor or neglectful to give them lunch money! And people like you claim to support family values? What a joke. Fiscal conservative? More like fake Conservative!