WIKI TOOLS

-

drafts

viewhistorytalk



<-- WIKI LIST

<- /s/SaidItSurveys/wiki/index

SaidIt Survey Drafts

WORKS IN PROGRESS

This is an open wiki for anyone in the SaidIt community to edit. Respect other's work. If you're concerned about deleting someone else's work then put it in brackets or use double ~ on either side to strike it out.

Remember to remove drafts after they've been posted.

Format = 4 sections for each post draft :

  1. issue - short summary

  2. title - for post <=300 characters

  3. body - for post full details

  4. notes / comments / extra information / discussion / reviews - before they're actually posted to SaidIt at large



Administration


1) [ empty ]

  • Title:

[ empty ]

  • Body:

[ empty ]

  • Notes / Comments:

[ empty ]



Design


1) SaidIt Survey: Adopt/Apply New 2019 Logo?

  • Title:

SaidIt Survey: Adopt/Apply New 2019 Logo?

  • Body:

[ empty ]

  • Notes / Comments:

    • New logo / variation / treatment / colour every year / birthday / season / holiday / event ?
    • Constructive criticisms?
    • Requests?

Copypasta from chat:

/u/d3rr : logo on the header, side by side with existing


2) SaidIt Survey: Adopt/Apply New CSS?

  • Title:

SaidIt Survey: Adopt/Apply New CSS?

  • Body:

[ empty ]

  • Notes / Comments:

    • Constructive criticisms?
    • Requests?
    • site wide?, opinions?, suggestions?, improvements?

Copypasta from chat:

/u/JasonCarswell : Well it all started when I had lots of noob ideas and suggestions and you guys said do it yourself in a CSS and put it to a vote to see if people want to accept the revision site wide. I'd be honoured if they did but I won't be insulted if they don't. Now that I know where all the things are and how they work I could do a toned down less ergonomic version for style rather than function. But it's not a priority and I have nothing immediately coming to mind for that.

/u/JasonCarswell : Also asking for suggestions and open for questions on some of my design motivations - primarily ergonomic with style second - I still have to rework day though.



Features


1) SaidIt Survey: Top 3 IdeasForSaidIt Feature Requests

  • Title:

SaidIt Survey: Top 3 IdeasForSaidIt Feature Requests

  • Body:

The SaidIt features wish list ideas are good, bad, ugly, and incomplete. AND OVERWHELMING! Some of the bad ideas may lead to better ones so even the bad ideas are helpful, if for nothing other than an issue indicator and placeholder. So clearly this long list is potentially useful but we need to help M7D3 focus.

So introducing...

Top 3 IdeasForSaidIt Feature Requests

Feel free to take a look at or add to the long SaidIt features wish list, but this survey is about narrowing it down to the most wanted, most important, and best ideas to be focused on.

We want to hear everyone's input, feedback, discussion, and ideas about features you want for an authentically democratic transparent development of this website and community.

Other related or not-related ideas to improve the transparent process of notification and implementation, other policies, and the future of SaidIt are welcome too and though there may already be discussions ongoing, concluded, or in the works, if you don't participate we can't inform you about them.

Already active:

  • A SaidIt iPhone app variant of Beam for Reddit on iOS - currently in development.

  • Decentralization - a long term goal, 1-2 years out.

See also: https://infogalactic.com/info/SaidIt#Future_plans

  • Notes / Comments:

[ empty ]



Moderation


1) [ empty ]

  • Title:

[ empty ]

  • Body:

[ empty ]

  • Notes / Comments:

[ empty ]



Multi-Issue


1) SaidIt Survey: NSFW Policy Ideas + Default Configs

  • Title:

SaidIt Survey: NSFW Policy Ideas + Default Configs

  • Body:

Being controversial is a potential free-speech target - and maybe even threat to the future of SaidIt so this issue requires extra attention and responsible policies.

Take a look at the CSS theme of /s/WatchPeopleDie to see a potential example of a customized theme. In this example, the only area affected is the header/banner.

About the /s/WatchPeopleDie CSS theme, /u/JasonCarswell specifically chose that sub not to be mod (won't even look at the titles in the WPD sub) but to create an example of addressing controversial content responsibly with design and to propose we discuss these ideas and policies to maybe find ways to improve and fortify our community.

  1. Are there other cautionary design ideas worth applying to that CSS theme? (ie. night mode dark-red background / day mode light-orange background)

  2. Is the cautionary design theme over doing it, not enough, or just right?

  3. Should all NSFW subs by default get a distinguishing CSS theme? (mod may override with custom sub CSS theme)

  4. Would you like something like the /s/WatchPeopleDie theme to become the NSFW default warning theme?

  5. Would you like something different than the /s/WatchPeopleDie theme to become the NSFW default warning theme?

  6. What would you change on the /s/WatchPeopleDie theme?

  7. Are there other design warning indicators to consider?

  8. Are there other non-design steps to consider?

  9. Are there other policy ideas to consider?

Another reason /u/JasonCarswell created the sub and handed it off was so that the subsaidit would be called "WatchPeopleDie" not "WPD" that curious folks may stumble into by accident. This may be a great to apply site-wide as a new policy for NSFW content.

  1. Should all new NSFW subsaidits be mandatorially full names rather than initials?

  2. Should all new NSFW subsaidits be mandatorially full names without abbreviations?

  3. Should all new NSFW subsaidits be mandatorially full names with unmistakable meanings?

  4. Should there be a grandfather clause protecting existing NSFW subsaidits?

  • Notes / Comments:

[ empty ]



Policy


1) SaidIt Survey: Empty Subs Policy Ideas

  • Title:

SaidIt Survey: Empty Subs Policy Ideas

  • Body:

[ empty ]

  • Notes / Comments:

    • squatting on names is one thing, unseen, squatting on subs is another?
    • discus pros and cons of sub-squatting?
    • why the neeeeed to be mod so bad you'd squat?
    • is that good non-extremist mod behaviour?
    • use it or loose it after 2 months minimum? (vote on time span)
    • people have concerns about admins messing with the database.
    • are concerns of database editing sufficiently eased with enough transparency?
    • 1 to 4 purges per year? (vote on time span)


2) SaidIt Survey: Bot Transparency Policy Ideas

  • Title:

SaidIt Survey: Bot Transparency Policy Ideas

  • Body:

[ empty ]

  • Notes / Comments:

    • do folks realize A.I. is only going to get better?
    • - do folks realize the Technocracy will infiltrate all threats?
    • - do folks realize the Technocracy will have the best bots?
    • - do folks even care about the threat of the Technocracy?
    • - do folks even care if posts are bot or not?
    • - do folks even want bot policy?
    • bot transparency policy - must declare or not?
    • - must notify mods/admins about applying bots?
    • - must declare bot activity in sub sidebox description? (ie. "This sub has bots.")
    • - bots only allowed to post to declared subs? (ie. "This sub has bots.")
    • - bots only allowed to post to dedicated bot-labeled subs? (ie. /s/videos_bots or /s/bots_videos)
    • grandfathering policy for extant bots?
    • - must existing pre-policy bots declare themselves?
    • - must existing pre-policy bots declare themselves to get exemptions from new policies?
    • - must existing pre-policy bots relocated to dedicated subs if new bots are?



Topical


1) [ empty ]

  • Title:

[ empty ]

  • Body:

[ empty ]

  • Notes / Comments:

[ empty ]



Uncertain / Other


1) [ empty ]

  • Title:

[ empty ]

  • Body:

[ empty ]

  • Notes / Comments:

[ empty ]




revision by JasonCarswell— view source