you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Learning from mistakes is my strong suit, that's why I'm assembling this new content admin team and writing a rules clarification page so they all know the rules and precisely how to apply them.

[–]HibikiBlack 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not to brag but I post factual cases of corruption involving the government and corporations on a near daily basis. I already collected over a thousand. If you guys help me out with exposure then it would help the aesthetics of the site...

I don't even care about being an admin, just that people see the potential of Saidit.

[–]send_nasty_stuff 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If you don't mind could you please consider carving some type of exception in the pyramid of debate and the content rules to allow for humor, art, religion, and memes? I've always thought that the saidit rules never quite addressed these unique exceptions. IMO it's only when people are politically debating in good faith do they need to be following POD with rigor. Communication comes in a lot of forms and we need to try to attract all types of communities.